On Thu 2013-08-22 13:40, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
> > Can you explain to me why you would need a different analyzer for a
> > wildcard query? My brain is still tanning on the beach.
>
> Well, it's the Lucene way. Wildcard
Hi Emmanuel,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
> Can you explain to me why you would need a different analyzer for a
> wildcard query? My brain is still tanning on the beach.
Well, it's the Lucene way. Wildcard queries are usually not analyzed
(see QueryParser or what you'
It looks like an interesting idea especially as it keep the simple use
case simple (ie simply not defining an queryAnalyzer.
Can you explain to me why you would need a different analyzer for a
wildcard query? My brain is still tanning on the beach.
Brainstorming here we could do the following
@A
Hi,
Note: this is just a prospective idea I'd like to discuss. Even if
it's a good idea, it's definitely 5.0 material.
Those who have used Solr and are familiar with the Solr schema have
already seen the ability to use different analyzer for indexing and
querying.
It's usually useful when you us
