ail Badner"
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 1:51:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Configuration as data for generating
metamodel
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't see what we would gain by this. In fact I don't know how you want
> to
> do this. The way forward is
"
To: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org, "Gail Badner"
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 1:51:30 AM
Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Configuration as data for generating metamodel
Hi,
I don't see what we would gain by this. In fact I don't know how you want
to
do this. The way forward is the ne
Hi,
I don't see what we would gain by this. In fact I don't know how you want
to
do this. The way forward is the new metamodel.
Given the current state I don't believe into a beta1 either (at least not
w/ the functionality we discussed), but if we are looking for a way out,
I don't think this i
I've been thinking about how we can have the metamodel API in place in time for
the 4.0.0.beta1.
One alternative is to use a fully built o.h.cfg.Configuration to provide the
data for generating the new metamodel.
This is obviously not what we would want in the end, but in the near term it
woul
