Per the discussion Luis and I had on IRC we will go with the prefix
"hibernate.enhancer..". "enhancer" makes it more than clear what the
intended target is.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:50 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> thanks for this proposal, I was looking forward to see more
> improvem
I think that document only landed on 5.1 because lazy groups is 5.1 only.
Docs for 5.0 (and these are just on how to use the build-time plugins)
are in a different place:
documentation/src/main/asciidoc/topical/bytecode/BytecodeEnhancement.adoc
On 12/04/2015 12:58 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Lu
Luis, I am trying to remember if there is any reason I only added this to
master (5.1). Was there a reason to not add it to 5.0 as well? Aside from
the parts about lazy groups that is :)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:28 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:43 AM Steve Ebersole wrot
On 4 December 2015 at 12:32, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> I investigated this issue:
>
> On master it's all fine:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> but the 5.0.5 tag didn't declare the Bytecode chapter:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vlad
That's great, thanks! Now I might play with it too :)
Sa
I investigated this issue:
On master it's all fine:
but the 5.0.5 tag didn't declare the Bytecode chapter:
Vlad
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:50 AM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luis,
> > thanks for
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:43 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Hm, there is a problem in the doc generation apparently :( For some
> reason this chapter is not pulled in
> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/blob/master/documentation/src/main/docbook/userGuide/en-US/chapters/enhancement/BytecodeE
This all sounds good to me. For runtime enhancement I am ok with
deprecating that setting, as long as in the meantime until its removal we
continue to treat it as enabling all the enhancement features in addition
to logging that warning.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:29 AM Luis Barreiro wrote:
> Hi
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:50 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> thanks for this proposal, I was looking forward to see more
> improvements in the area.
>
> Adding more properties sounds good to me, although I'd not use the
> prefix "hibernate.enhance" as it sounds like it's about enhancing
> H
Hi Luis,
thanks for this proposal, I was looking forward to see more
improvements in the area.
Adding more properties sounds good to me, although I'd not use the
prefix "hibernate.enhance" as it sounds like it's about enhancing
Hibernate - which might be true but one could say the same with many
o
I like the idea of having multiple properties to enable a particular
bytecode enhancement feature.
It could be that the clients want to speed-up dirty checking but they don't
really use the lazy initialization.
Vlad
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Luis Barreiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion to know what is the general opinion
about $subject, triggered by HHH- 10356.
I'm also taking the opportunity to hear about some considerations I have
on the configuration of the build-time plugins.
*
**
**- Run time*
Right now it is not possible t
11 matches
Mail list logo
