Definitely. Thanks for doing this
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 3:25 PM Gail Badner wrote:
> I'm happy to see all the progress on this while I've been occupied with
> 5.1.13 and some other urgent issues.
>
> I hope to have time to get caught up on things later today or tomorrow.
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 20
I'm happy to see all the progress on this while I've been occupied with
5.1.13 and some other urgent issues.
I hope to have time to get caught up on things later today or tomorrow.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> I've mostly used Japicmp recently http://siom79.github.i
I've mostly used Japicmp recently http://siom79.github.io/japicmp/). Works
pretty well, but it lacks a way to distinguish between API and SPI, so
you'll likely also see "false positives". In fact I thought it's the one
you'd be using, but it doesn't seem so from looking at the report attached
to th
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> To make sure all the noise form "false positives" won't get us to miss
> something, someone knows an alternative tool which can do better?
>
We use this one for HV https://github.com/siom79/japicmp . Not sure it's
better though.
If not,
I just pushed the first round of fixes for this upstream.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:00 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 22 March 2018 at 15:55, David Lloyd wrote:
> > This tool is usually pretty good; in fact I think it likely that it's
> > the best of its kind. The false positives are really a
On 22 March 2018 at 15:55, David Lloyd wrote:
> This tool is usually pretty good; in fact I think it likely that it's
> the best of its kind. The false positives are really a fairly recent
> development AFAIK; I don't recall hitting any when I ran it for our
> EJB changes a year or two ago. It m
This tool is usually pretty good; in fact I think it likely that it's
the best of its kind. The false positives are really a fairly recent
development AFAIK; I don't recall hitting any when I ran it for our
EJB changes a year or two ago. It might be a good idea to contribute
a fix for the problem
Not sure. animal-sniffer is the other one I know, but not sure it would be
better.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:21 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> To make sure all the noise form "false positives" won't get us to miss
> something, someone knows an alternative tool which can do better?
>
> Thanks,
> S
To make sure all the noise form "false positives" won't get us to miss
something, someone knows an alternative tool which can do better?
Thanks,
Sanne
On 22 March 2018 at 14:22, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Yes there were "lots of differences" but a vast majority of them are
> false-positives, not j
Yes there were "lots of differences" but a vast majority of them are
false-positives, not just those listed in the already massive "false
positives" section. I've been going through the non-"false positive"
section and "resolving" specific items (via strike-through) with either (1)
link to Jira fi
Thanks Gail, great job!
I fixed a trivial one, just a thousand to go ;)
On 16 March 2018 at 23:09, Gail Badner wrote:
> I've moved the document to
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jH0znbYwgvGKHC-110zcjRaXLllBsvRKw-pdHrMzRzw
> .
>
> Please let me know if you need an invite to view the documen
I've moved the document to
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jH0znbYwgvGKHC-110zcjRaXLllBsvRKw-pdHrMzRzw
.
Please let me know if you need an invite to view the document.
The attachments are still at https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/
HibernateORMBinaryCompatibilityBetween51And53.
Regards,
Gail
Hi,
There were lots of differences in the compatibility report, so as a first
step, I've excluded packages/classes that I considered SPI, internal, or
"grey area". This reduced the the differences to a more manageable amount.
You can see a summary of the incompatibilities along with suggested
mit
13 matches
Mail list logo
