Hi Sanne,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> But: AFAIR pre-4 support was entirely dropped, this additional
> dependency is only useful for indexes created between 4.0 to 5.0. You
> never fully rebuilt the indexes since Lucene 3.x?
>
Probably not - we haven't changed the
On 19 September 2015 at 09:11, Gustavo Fernandes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Guillaume Smet
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I upgraded our framework to 5.5.0 and I have a few questions about it.
>>
>> ==
>> First, I had to remove the existing indexes otherwise I had exceptions
>> about vers
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Guillaume Smet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded our framework to 5.5.0 and I have a few questions about it.
>
> ==
> First, I had to remove the existing indexes otherwise I had exceptions
> about version of the index. Is this expected? As far as I remember, it's
> been
Thanks Guillaume,
Good feedback, see inline.
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 21:43, Guillaume Smet wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded our framework to 5.5.0 and I have a few questions about it.
>
> ==
> First, I had to remove the existing indexes otherwise I had exceptions
> about version of the index. Is th
Hi,
I upgraded our framework to 5.5.0 and I have a few questions about it.
==
First, I had to remove the existing indexes otherwise I had exceptions
about version of the index. Is this expected? As far as I remember, it's
been a long time since we had to remove the indexes after an upgrade.
Caus
