On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:46:14 +0100, Sanne Grinovero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
about the size
=
If so we need two settings I believe since the default size of these two
different thread pools will be different, right?
yes you got the point, this is why I'm writing here.
Actually the s
inline answers;
2008/11/21 Hardy Ferentschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:14:16 +0100, Sanne Grinovero
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> because of HSEARCH-268( optimize indexes in parallel ) but also for
>> other purposes, I am in need to define a new ThreadPool in Hibernate
>> S
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:14:16 +0100, Sanne Grinovero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
because of HSEARCH-268( optimize indexes in parallel ) but also for
other purposes, I am in need to define a new ThreadPool in Hibernate
Search's Lucene backend.
The final effect will actually be that all changes to
Hello,
because of HSEARCH-268( optimize indexes in parallel ) but also for
other purposes, I am in need to define a new ThreadPool in Hibernate
Search's
Lucene backend.
The final effect will actually be that all changes to indexes are
going to be performed in parallel (on different indexes).
I cons
