nice, thanks all. Optimistically labelled these issues as 5.0
Also, there are other issues open already which suggested API
improvements: so while indeed the API isn't new anymore, we haven't
properly incorporated all feedback.
Looks like we all agree it stays experimental for now.
On 19 Decembe
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1469
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1470
On Thu 2013-12-19 12:36, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> > geol
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:13, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2013/12/19 Hardy Ferentschik
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> > geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
>
> not sure. I
2013/12/19 Hardy Ferentschik
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> > geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
>
> not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less ap
On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but
better than geoquery which
g
When I used it, I was mostly fine with it. I had only a few remarks:
- we should add the support for miles. Only having kilometers was in
retrospect wrong.
- spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
- in t
Sent from my iPad
On 14 dec 2013, at 13:55, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> While I hope the API won't need any change, the implementation will be
> different: for one some Lucene APIs changed which affect it
> significantly, and also Lucene 4 provides some of this functionality
> already.
>
> We'll b
While I hope the API won't need any change, the implementation will be
different: for one some Lucene APIs changed which affect it
significantly, and also Lucene 4 provides some of this functionality
already.
We'll be in a better position to decide on this after we know the
actual difference?
On
Hi Hardy,
I would have liked to have more user feedbacks before that.
But as the use case is not that frequent ...
Have some of the Hibernate Search team members some time to test it ?
Do you have any feedback ?
Niko
2013/12/13 Hardy Ferentschik :
> Hi,
>
> Given that we are moving to Search 5 a
Hi,
Given that we are moving to Search 5 and we made some recent adjustments, I am
wondering whether it would
not be time to remove the experimental status of the spatial Api now? Thoughts?
—Hardy
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jbo
10 matches
Mail list logo
