On 21 Feb 2014, at 01:15, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I still suspect that a DisMax approach would provide a better scoring
> model but this is an implementation detail we should iterate on at a
> second phase.
> Essentially taking the example of "albino elephants" I agree on the
> behaviour you de
Many excellent ideas here, thanks.
Answering to brought up concepts in reverse order:
# Depending on Solr
Yes I'm indeed very happy of having removed this dependency; not least
from a product perspective it forced us to address security issues in
its various web/ servlet components: strict qa chec
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
> BTW DisjunctionMaxQuery (which is what I refered to in .dismax()) is
> used in the DisMax query parser of Slor but is only a component of it.
> So I see your requested feature as a different one than what I discussed
> in this email. Still
That is definitely something I think Hibernate Search lacks.
Offer an implementation that can in a robust way swallow a user provided
query input and create the right query.
This is not something we have had time to explore seriously.
BTW DisjunctionMaxQuery (which is what I refered to in .dismax(
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
> ## DisMax as top level DSL feature
>
> Should we add .dismax() like we did bool()?
> I am hard pressed to find a use case.
It's a project I have for a long time. I wanted to have an intern this
year to work on this and a fe
I have been thinking about our initial idea to use DisjunctionMaxQuery
(aka DisMax) with MoreLikeThis instead of the Boolean query we have
today.
## Definition and landscape
DisMax lets you amongst a set of subqueries under a SHOULD clause boost
the matching documents up to the score of the high
