On 17 July 2014 16:53, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> I've no strong opinion, both ways work for me.
>
> At least I haven't missed the feature so far, and as Sanne is saying, pull
> requests are referenced automatically now anyways. Is there any strong
> advantage of using that workflow?
No it's not goi
I've no strong opinion, both ways work for me.
At least I haven't missed the feature so far, and as Sanne is saying, pull
requests are referenced automatically now anyways. Is there any strong
advantage of using that workflow?
Am 17.07.2014 15:18 schrieb "Sanne Grinovero" :
>
> On 17 July 2014 1
On 17 July 2014 13:59, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Hibernate Search has a pull request workflow where a specific status Pull
> Request Sent exists.
> Do we want it for OGM? Do you think it would add more value to the clutter it
> brings?
>
> That question is mostly for Gunnar and Davide. I am neut
Hibernate Search has a pull request workflow where a specific status Pull
Request Sent exists.
Do we want it for OGM? Do you think it would add more value to the clutter it
brings?
That question is mostly for Gunnar and Davide. I am neutral personally.
Sanne what’s your feedback after using it
