On 16 January 2017 at 18:49, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I think we are all saying that we personally find it far more useful to have
> the sources (which have the Javadoc btw ;) available in the IDE compared to
> having just the Javadoc.
I definitely agree but it's not an exclusive either/or ;)
> I
I think we are all saying that we personally find it far more useful to
have the sources (which have the Javadoc btw ;) available in the IDE
compared to having just the Javadoc.
It's not a question of easy to generate/publish, it's a question of what is
useful. If someone finds it useful they can
I'm not sure if the agreement is in wanting to keep the status quo, or
if it's simply not worth our time to chase such things. In other
words: may I suggest to such users that we'd accept a pull request, or
you'd rather not waste bandwidth during releases?
Either way is fine by me, but I wonder if
I agree with Steve and Gunnar.
On 16 January 2017 at 15:41, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> +1 The source JARs are the important thing here.
>
> Just tried out the JavaDoc view in Eclipse for the first time as
> you're mentioning it. Can't say I find it overly useful nor that I've
> been missing it for
+1 The source JARs are the important thing here.
Just tried out the JavaDoc view in Eclipse for the first time as
you're mentioning it. Can't say I find it overly useful nor that I've
been missing it for all these years :)
2017-01-16 15:43 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole :
> I personally think that publ
I personally think that publishing Javadocs per artifact is silly so I do
not do it for ORM. Its a limiting view. We already publish an
"aggregated" Javadoc that (again imo) is far better. As you point out
Sanne, we do publish sources to repo which at the IDE level is MUCH better
On Mon, Jan 16
Hi,
It's an issue we have for several of our projects (ie also on NoORM
projects), namely those building the javadoc in an aggregated task at the
end of the build.
It bugged me a little at first but as Eclipse defaults to using source
anyway, I didn't care that much about this. It might be a good
Hi all,
I noticed some people [1] asking why we don't deploy the javadoc
jarfile in Maven repositories.
That's very helpful for IDE integrations; I never noticed - nor am I
sure how to verify - as my IDE falls back to using the sources.
Knowing how reliable Maven Central's directory listing are,
