On 12 juil. 2010, at 15:43, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:31:17 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
>
>>> just wondering whether there is a reason why we don't expose the
>>> configuration properties in SearchFactory?
>>> I think we talked about this once, but I cannot remembe
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:31:17 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
>> just wondering whether there is a reason why we don't expose the
>> configuration properties in SearchFactory?
>> I think we talked about this once, but I cannot remember exactly.
>
> There are several reasons but one of them is to
On 9 juil. 2010, at 17:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just wondering whether there is a reason why we don't expose the
> configuration properties in SearchFactory?
> I think we talked about this once, but I cannot remember exactly.
There are several reasons but one of them is to know
Hi,
just wondering whether there is a reason why we don't expose the
configuration properties in SearchFactory?
I think we talked about this once, but I cannot remember exactly.
I noticed that the properties are now exposed in
StateSearchFactoryImplementor anyways. Maybe
we could push this al