Re: [hibernate-dev] Pull request sent for HHH-3551

2011-01-12 Thread Laird Nelson
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > hi Laird, > sorry I just noticed that our thread fell of the mailing list, please > keep everyone in CC as I'm not the most expert on these aspects. > > Did you get any results? > Not yet. I'll keep you posted. L

Re: [hibernate-dev] Pull request sent for HHH-3551

2011-01-05 Thread Laird Nelson
Ah, sorry, I see that pull requests have their own URLs. Here is the URL to mine: https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-core/pull/27 Thanks, and sorry again for the newbie incompetence. Best, Laird On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Laird Nelson wrote: > Not sure whether it is appropriate

[hibernate-dev] Pull request sent for HHH-3551

2011-01-05 Thread Laird Nelson
Not sure whether it is appropriate to note it here, but in the interest of transparency: as part of my campaign to get http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3551 reopened and fixed, I've sent a github pull request with a patch that fixes the problem. Please kindly advise if

Re: [hibernate-dev] HHH-3551: Closed and rejected, but possibly still valid?

2011-01-05 Thread Laird Nelson
I can confirm that HHH-3551 is NOT invalid, i.e. that it should be reopened. I will attach a patch file. L On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Laird Nelson wrote: > Hello. > > We're running into > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3551. The

[hibernate-dev] HHH-3551: Closed and rejected, but possibly still valid?

2011-01-05 Thread Laird Nelson
Hello. We're running into http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3551. The original poster requested that this (ancient) bug be closed (which it was), because, apparently, a JDBC driver upgrade solved the problem. But I'm not sure. We seem to be running into the same issu