Hi Guillaume,
A Maven plugin for build time enhancement of entities is coded up.
Not without a few problems along the way. But I think we are there now.
Comments are in-lined with your questions.
There should be a plugin in the maven repo soon (if not now) using a
Mojo and the necessary des
c locking was proved in testing
to be too buggy. Scott's question in the jira demonstrates the issue. In
my testing concurrent transactions did end up competing.
> On 08/11/2013 06:45 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> On 9 August 2013 19:08, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>>> Hi Scott,
#x27;t even being used in this particular situation.
I think the tradeoff is the frequency 0 or n times of sequence
incrementing OLE versus the frequency n of incrementing the sequence
table in a separate transaction during runtime. Both can be managed by
tuning.
Regards,
Jeremy
> On 08/11/2
18:20, Scott Marlow wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 11:21 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>I am looking for feedback on changes to provide the ability for work
>> to be completed in a currently running transaction. For example when a
>> TableGenerator or SequenceGenerator i
Hi,
I am looking for feedback on changes to provide the ability for work
to be completed in a currently running transaction. For example when a
TableGenerator or SequenceGenerator is being used for generating unique
ids. The statements that select then update the db are executed in a
separate
