Inline...
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:10 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> At high level I agree, just have 3 more thoughts:
>
> # Regarding the "swap" of information between listeners - could that
> even work? I might have misunderstood something, but wouldn't we
> require listeners to run in some spec
At high level I agree, just have 3 more thoughts:
# Regarding the "swap" of information between listeners - could that
even work? I might have misunderstood something, but wouldn't we
require listeners to run in some specific order for such swapping to
work?
# The "surround advice" you mention fo
The overall concept with event+listeners initially was that listeners would
"collaborate" which each other with the event as a token for common
information. The "result" of the operation was made part of the event to
facilitate this design - the idea being that one listener might swap the
result,
Hi,
> I think that's a great idea
Same here!
Another advantage is we separate the "SPI"/internal interface (Handler)
from the API that can be implemented by users (listeners).
That could be a great help moving forward to evolve Hibernate ORM without
breaking APIs.
> but I wonder about the reada
