+1 to everything Yoann said.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019, 5:42 AM Yoann Rodiere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should make it clear that only LTS JVMs are actually supported,
> and non-LTS JVMs are only supported on a "best effort" basis, with some
> focus on the very latest non-LTS JVM.
> I doubt we hav
Hi,
I think we should make it clear that only LTS JVMs are actually supported,
and non-LTS JVMs are only supported on a "best effort" basis, with some
focus on the very latest non-LTS JVM.
I doubt we have the appropriate resources to do anything more than that.
To be more specific, I would see th