On 9/20/18 3:17 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> I'm going to try some more changes on the WF side, to see if I can work
> around this problem. I'll report back on how that goes. :)
I tried overriding the ServiceRegistryImplementor#initiateService(Map
configurationValues, ServiceRegistryImplementor r
I'm going to try some more changes on the WF side, to see if I can work
around this problem. I'll report back on how that goes. :)
On 9/20/18 12:05 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> Is https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/63241549820243923aab16e664c3c6c3
> closer to what we need?
>
> On 9/19/18 3:47 PM
Is https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/63241549820243923aab16e664c3c6c3
closer to what we need?
On 9/19/18 3:47 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> StandardServiceRegistry`No, it's not.
>
> Each call to `registry.getService( RegionFactory.class )` in your test
> returns the same `RegionFactory` - by de
