Hi Willi,
My preference would be to limit the first round to the actual javax.money
stuff.
We are running a survey currently at
http://beanvalidation.org/news/2016/09/15/which-constraints-to-add/ asking
whether to add @Negative/@Positive. Based on that we need to decide whether
to add them to the
Sanne, sure. But that sucks. Because its not just "WF integration" we are
testing. We also use that as the basis for testing how Hibernate works in
various in-container scenarios (CDI, BV, etc) which are not WF-specific.
So, at the moment I cannot begin to tell you, e.g., whether Hibernate's CD
Hi Steve,
In Search and OGM we simply skip the Wildfly integration tests when running
on Java 9.
Sanne
On 29 Sep 2016 14:49, "Scott Marlow" wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2016 08:15 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > It seems like Shigeru and team have Javassist Java 9 compatible now. Per
> > https://issue
On 09/27/2016 08:15 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> It seems like Shigeru and team have Javassist Java 9 compatible now. Per
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261 I have played with the propsed
> changes using a SNAPSHOT of that built and pushed by Scott. Using that
> SNAPSHOT, all those te
Hi,
I'm currently preparing a pull request to contribute Java Money related
validators to HV:
https://github.com/zalando/money-validation
The main part are custom validators to add support for MonetaryAmount to
the following constraints:
- DecimalMax
- DecimalMin
- Max
- Min
As an a
Hello,
I prepared another PR for a very old issue:
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1577
The PR contains a testcase and the fix for the
issue(https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HQLPARSER-15)
Regards,
Christian
___
hibernate-dev mail
