Re: [hibernate-dev] multiLoad support

2016-07-25 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On 25 July 2016 at 19:55, Steve Ebersole wrote: > See inline... > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:06 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >> some comments inline: >> >> On 25 July 2016 at 18:27, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> > I wanted to start a consolidated discussion about multi-load support. >> > This >> >

Re: [hibernate-dev] multiLoad support

2016-07-25 Thread Steve Ebersole
See inline... On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:06 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote: > some comments inline: > > On 25 July 2016 at 18:27, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > I wanted to start a consolidated discussion about multi-load support. > This > > relates to a few Jiras, questioning a few different aspects of i

Re: [hibernate-dev] multiLoad support

2016-07-25 Thread Sanne Grinovero
some comments inline: On 25 July 2016 at 18:27, Steve Ebersole wrote: > I wanted to start a consolidated discussion about multi-load support. This > relates to a few Jiras, questioning a few different aspects of its current > behavior: > > https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10984 > https

Re: [hibernate-dev] multiLoad support

2016-07-25 Thread andrea boriero
On 25 Jul 2016 19:29, "Steve Ebersole" wrote: > > I wanted to start a consolidated discussion about multi-load support. This > relates to a few Jiras, questioning a few different aspects of its current > behavior: > > https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10984 > https://hibernate.atlassian.n

[hibernate-dev] multiLoad support

2016-07-25 Thread Steve Ebersole
I wanted to start a consolidated discussion about multi-load support. This relates to a few Jiras, questioning a few different aspects of its current behavior: https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10984 https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10617 Basically this comes down to the follo

Re: [hibernate-dev] [OGM] Mapping of embedded

2016-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
On Sat 2016-07-23 1:55, Guillaume Smet wrote: > Hi all, > > So after having discussed this issue with Emmanuel: > > 1/ is correct. It's the behavior we expect considering the ORM behavior. If > we want the postal_code to be nested in homeAddress, we need to use > @Column(name = "homeAddress.po