That's great news.
We have the chance of overriding the old Google index now because the new
User Guide has a different content than the old doc.
If by default, we redirect the user to the "current" version, then we could
make sure that Google returns the same link even after we switch to a new
ve
At this point the 5.1 documentation is all hosted[1] and the hibernate.org
website updated to reflect this[2].
Consolidating a lot of simultaneous discussions going on, the remaining
tasks imo:
1. Develop an answer for the SEO problem. Whether that can be achieved
continuing to use the JBo
Looks good, thanks, Steve!
2016-02-12 19:12 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole :
> Sanne. Emmanuel.. the rsync is already done. Docs from 3.0->5.3 (as of the
> last release on SF for that x.y).
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:12 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>
>> Emmanuel, Davide, etal...
>>
>> I think I wan
Looks good:
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.1/userguide/html_single/Hibernate_User_Guide.html
I'll write a blog post about it netx week.
Thanks,
Vlad
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Vlad, here is the ongoing work for this on the staging branch for the
> website.
Vlad, here is the ongoing work for this on the staging branch for the
website...
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate.org/tree/staging/orm/documentation/5.1
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:05 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Vlad, today I will work updating the website for ORM. Versioned
> information
Sanne. Emmanuel.. the rsync is already done. Docs from 3.0->5.3 (as of the
last release on SF for that x.y).
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:12 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Emmanuel, Davide, etal...
>
> I think I want to redo that decision to put versioned links on the nav.
> That was always just a t
Emmanuel, Davide, etal...
I think I want to redo that decision to put versioned links on the nav.
That was always just a temp solution, as it was the easiest way to add
handling for versioned docs. But as I add 5.1 docs we would now have 4
links on the nav for docs. That's starting to get fugly.
Hi Steve,
a message from Emmanuel (he can't send emails right now):
Vladimir from jboss.org will give us a full backup, so don't worry too
much on all the older versions. If you could just restore 5.3 (from
5.3.0.Alpha1), 5.2 (from 5.2.3.Final) and 4.3 (from 4.3.2.Final), we
would be in good shape
Vlad, today I will work updating the website for ORM. Versioned
information (documentation) is very difficult to deal with there (imho)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:01 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I went all the way back to 3.0. rsync started
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:44 AM Gunnar Morling
>
I went all the way back to 3.0. rsync started
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:44 AM Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> The more, the better. At least 4.3 is needed as it's the last BV 1.0
> compatible version. I don't exactly remember what we had there, but I
> suppose all the way back till 3.0. So if you are
The more, the better. At least 4.3 is needed as it's the last BV 1.0
compatible version. I don't exactly remember what we had there, but I
suppose all the way back till 3.0. So if you are at 4.2, you are
almost there :)
2016-02-12 18:31 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole :
> so far I have downloaded back to
so far I have downloaded back to 4.2. Should I stop at 5.0?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:25 AM Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> That's weird indeed. Last time I checked (at the time of the HV 5.2.3
> release), everything was still in place.
>
> http://hibernate.org/validator/documentation/ links
Hey,
That's weird indeed. Last time I checked (at the time of the HV 5.2.3
release), everything was still in place.
http://hibernate.org/validator/documentation/ links to the following:
* http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/validator/5.3/reference/en-US/html/
* http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/valida
Links seems to be in the format x.y
At least looking at the links on
http://hibernate.org/validator/documentation/
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> What's the level of versions for the validator docs on the server? x.y?
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM Steve Eberso
What's the level of versions for the validator docs on the server? x.y?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> If the old style guides were there after the release, but gone since I
> uploaded yesterday then maybe my upload also affected the validator docs.
> No idea how that
If the old style guides were there after the release, but gone since I
uploaded yesterday then maybe my upload also affected the validator docs.
No idea how that could have happened though.
Anyway, I checked an the validator release bundles do in fact contain the
docs. I can work on restoring tho
But thats a completely different URL Vlad. That is a UR to the
hibernate.org server. Not the doc server.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM Vlad Mihalcea
wrote:
> The 5.1 docs are also missing too:
>
> http://hibernate.org/orm/documentation/5.1
>
> I remember I saw the old-style guide right afte
The 5.1 docs are also missing too:
http://hibernate.org/orm/documentation/5.1
I remember I saw the old-style guide right after the 5.1 release.
Vlad
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> That's strange. As far as I know we actually cannot delete from there. At
> least I w
That's strange. As far as I know we actually cannot delete from there. At
least I was not allowed to delete from orm/5.1 yesterday when I was doing
work.
As for restoring, I do not know if backups are kept. We could open a
ticket and see. If not, do y'all build docs into the release bundles?
T
Apparently http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/validator is gone from the
documentation server. Anyone has an idea of how that could have
happened?
How to fix it would be very useful too, I'm not sure we have a full
backup of all the documentation since the history of time.
Emmanuel
__
Sounds like 5.2. Soon. :)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:20 AM Petar Tahchiev
wrote:
> Moneta does not require Java9. I'm using it in my project with java8.
>
> 2016-02-12 16:19 GMT+02:00 Petar Tahchiev :
>
>> +1 On this :)
>>
>> 2015-03-22 2:38 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole :
>>
>>> So it sounds like
Moneta does not require Java9. I'm using it in my project with java8.
2016-02-12 16:19 GMT+02:00 Petar Tahchiev :
> +1 On this :)
>
> 2015-03-22 2:38 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole :
>
>> So it sounds like JSR 354 may not be included in Java 9. Do we still want
>> to support this for ORM 5? I am not
+1 On this :)
2015-03-22 2:38 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole :
> So it sounds like JSR 354 may not be included in Java 9. Do we still want
> to support this for ORM 5? I am not sure if "moneta" requires Java 9...
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hiberna
23 matches
Mail list logo
