Hello,
I have been working on a change to the pooled optimizer that we have been
seeing good performance results with. Basically it hands out blocks of ID's to
a thread local, rather than having every thread contend on the lock every time
an ID is required.
https://github.com/hibernate/hiberna
Was already there :) https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-5184
--
View this message in context:
http://hibernate-development.74578.x6.nabble.com/hibernate-dev-Why-does-Hibernate-has-aggressive-connection-releasing-for-JTA-tp759p905.html
Sent from the Hibernate Development mailing list ar
Well to be clear... ConnectionAcquitionMode is not yet hooked in. I'll add
that as another task for 5.1; given the work Andrea and I did for
transaction handling, this should be a pretty easy change.
--
View this message in context:
http://hibernate-development.74578.x6.nabble.com/hibernate-de
Just to follow up on this.. for ORM I went ahead and protected master, 5.0,
4.3 and 4.2 branches.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> This has always made me nervous ever since it happened a few times
> inadvertently after first moving to git. Thanks for pointing out that
I never said "the JPA is not smooth". I've never even used your framework,
how would I know that? ;)
I asked "Are there any changes in Hibernate that would make this work more
smoothly?"
We need you to tell us what would help you..
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:36 AM babyfish wrote:
> Hi hibernat
I personally don't see the need for this. As far as I know this has never
been a feature request from a user, either. We already have so many
configuration options, I prefer to add them only when there is a clear
reason or a clear user desire. I don't see either here, personally.
On Tue, Dec 8,
I just sent the request.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:26 PM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 17:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
> >> > BTW, there is already
On 10 December 2015 at 15:26, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I am not really sure what "have their headers patched to declare that the
> new guides are the canonical version" means in practical terms...
It means that the HTML pages of the documentation should have some
metadata within the header section
On 10 December 2015 at 17:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> > BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
>> > Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JB
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
> > Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set
> up a
> > number of lists by def
On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
> Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set up a
> number of lists by default. We just chose to not really use this one in
> particular. We
If anyone is unfamiliar with Nabble... Here is the Nabble-ized form of this
very mailing list: http://hibernate-development.74578.x6.nabble.com/
It looks/works just like a forum. For mailing-list backed Nabble forums it is
read-only in effect, unless you also subscribe to the mailing list.
On Th
I am not really sure what "have their headers patched to declare that the
new guides are the canonical version" means in practical terms...
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:55 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 16:36, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > We could leave the ones that are on docs.jb
BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set up
a number of lists by default. We just chose to not really use this one in
particular. We could use this one for purpose discussed here.
BTW, I looke
You know my thoughts on the forum. I think forum versus mailing list is
just very much a personal preference. Some people really like one or the
other. Why not split the middle and use mailing list + nabble?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, 7:35 AM Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > So basically I w
Hi,
> > So basically I would suggest:
> >
> > - Put the forum into a read only mode
> > - Add a banner explaining the move to Stackoverflow (similar in content to
> > what's in the post
> > mentioned above)
> > - Create a Hibernate Team on Stackoverflow
> > - Make sure all Hibernate related tag
On 10 December 2015 at 12:12, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:58:01PM +, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> This seems a nice precedent:
>> -
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-collections-users/m8FnCcmtC88
>
> Right, this is pretty much what I had in mind
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:58:01PM +, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> This seems a nice precedent:
> -
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-collections-users/m8FnCcmtC88
Right, this is pretty much what I had in mind as well. Whether one would create
a dedicated mailing list like hi
18 matches
Mail list logo
