+1 from me as well.
Gail
- Original Message -
> From: "Hardy Ferentschik"
> To: "Steve Ebersole"
> Cc: "Hibernate Dev"
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 12:37:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Enum mapping in hbm.xml
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:36:30PM +, Steve Ebersole
Ah, OK. I see.
Thanks,
Gail
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Ebersole"
> To: "Gail Badner" , "Hibernate"
>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 2:59:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev]
> org.hibernate.jpa.AvailableSettings.EVENT_LISTENER_PREFIX
>
> 2 very different things.
>
> Available
2 very different things.
AvailableSettings.EVENT_LISTENER_PREFIX identifies Hibernate event
listeners that the user wants incorporated into the
org.hibernate.event.service.spi.EventListenerRegistry.
It does not name JPA listeners/callbacks; that is done through JPA specific
means via annotations.
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "andrea boriero"
> To: "Steve Ebersole"
> Cc: "hibernate-dev"
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 8:22:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM Team "triage" meeting
>
> +1 for a dedicated room
>
> On 20 July 2015 at 15:52, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
> > Does
AvailableSettings.EVENT_LISTENER_PREFIX is set to "hibernate.ejb.event".
JpaIntegrator looks for ConfigurationService settings (which include
properties) with that prefix, then strips off that prefix to determine the
org.hibernate.event.spi.EventType.
I see that org.hibernate.event.spi.EventTy
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:36:30PM +, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > As far as the default type, I don't feel that strongly. Like I said, to
> > me neither is a really compelling way to map enums; names are only slightly
> > better that ordinals imo. I am ok with the consistency aspect.
+1 f
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9955
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:05 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Well, first things first :)
>
> Does anyone disagree with making this a requirement to be fully expressed
> in the mapping? In other words, does anyone disagree fully resolving the
> "enum t
Well, first things first :)
Does anyone disagree with making this a requirement to be fully expressed
in the mapping? In other words, does anyone disagree fully resolving the
"enum type" (ordinal/name)
in org.hibernate.type.EnumType#setParameterValues?
This would mean getting rid of the hooks in
+1 for a dedicated room
On 20 July 2015 at 15:52, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Does it make sense to have a dedicated meeting room? I wonder if the main
> hibernate-orm room is too chatty; if the discussion would just immediately
> get lost.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:07 PM Steve Ebersole
> wr
Does it make sense to have a dedicated meeting room? I wonder if the main
hibernate-orm room is too chatty; if the discussion would just immediately
get lost.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:07 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Ok, then lets plan on next Tuesday on HiptChat...
>
>
> http://www.timeanddate.
Sanne for MariaDB (and MySQL if we ever add it) we need to add at least one
more setting:
sql-mode="traditional"
We could probably get away with less ANSI compliant mode, but after days
playing with this I just want to cover my bases :)
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
Ah yes; I had pulled, that's why I couldn't reproduce this issue locally :)
Thanks for fixing it!
2015-07-20 14:13 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole :
> Pull again :) I fixed this yesterday. We were missing the SourceForge
> url for local resolution of the CFG DTD
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015, 3:30 AM Gunna
Pull again :) I fixed this yesterday. We were missing the SourceForge url
for local resolution of the CFG DTD
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015, 3:30 AM Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed an interesting failure of HibernateCacheTest from the
> "hibernate-ehcache" module in a recent ORM CI build [1].
Hi,
I noticed an interesting failure of HibernateCacheTest from the
"hibernate-ehcache" module in a recent ORM CI build [1].
It failed to obtain hibernate-configuration-3.0.dtd from SourceForge (there
was some service outage at SF at this time). Apart from the fact that the
test uses the legacy U
> On 19 Jul 2015, at 16:53, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
> What I propose is that we change this. I am kind of torn as to the default
> tbh. I think JPA's default of ORDINAL is the wrong choice. I think NAMED
> is the better choice. Well technically I think an independent mapping code
> it best.
15 matches
Mail list logo
