I don't ahve much to say besides what has been said on this thread
already.
The "tolerated" feature works in less cases than I anticipated as
Guillaume demonstrated. The different with the new patch is that it
happens systematically (on criteria restrictions) and leads to a lot of
unitary entity lo
On Thu 2014-03-20 18:50, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
> > I tend to disagree with you. The SimpleQueryBuilder seems to disagree
> > with you too as SHOULD is the default. Care to give your arguments in
> > favor of a different value for the def
On 21 Jan 2014, at 13:41, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> The question of being able to filter via Criteria or Hibernate Session
> Filters is a recurring feature request so we need to be cautious here.
The question is can we support it properly (most notably correctly).
> You make good points, and if
The question of being able to filter via Criteria or Hibernate Session
Filters is a recurring feature request so we need to be cautious here.
You make good points, and if it comes to a choice of support either/or
we'll certainly drop the Criteria filtering as obviously we won't make
concessions on
Hi Hardy,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> I am even wondering whether we should not go a step further and disallow
> the use of Criterias altogether in FullTextSessionImpl by throwing an
> exception
> in case of its use. We then can add an explicit method to FullText
Thanks for looking into this Alex. Like Emmanuel, I'd assume providers
would want to leverage any advantages they see in their native APIs, but a
107-based cache implementation would certainly be useful.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Alex Snaps wrote:
> Started yesterday night actually...
Hi Guillaume,
nice job with this issue. I was about to comment on the pull request, but
now I do it here.
On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:10, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> So, my patch here [1] broke a test which checks that Criteria +
> restrictions mostly work - even if it's documented as not supported
> an
Hi,
= Context =
So, my patch here [1] broke a test which checks that Criteria +
restrictions mostly work - even if it's documented as not supported
and not working.
"Mostly" as in "you can't get the result size but you might get the
results". See [2] for explanations.
I spent some time yesterda
