I took some more time to think about our conversation from 2 IRC meeting ago
about offering the ability to carry session bound state not related to
ORM per se.
Below is a sum and a potential solution.
If you are short on time, read Goals, then the SessionSessionEventListener
approach and ignore the
+100
On 20 Jan 2014, at 16:21, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
>
> The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, including
> some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability of
> IO operations: nice thin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
> I tend to disagree with you. The SimpleQueryBuilder seems to disagree
> with you too as SHOULD is the default. Care to give your arguments in
> favor of a different value for the default?
Well, IMHO, this feature is designed for a specifi
Note this would affect only our upcoming Hibernate Search 5.0: it's a
major release which breaks some backwards compatibility anyway. I
guess that blasts any remaining concern?
For the purpose of WFK users in maintenance mode I'll expect them to
stay on previous Search version, on which we'll back
On Thu 20 Mar 2014 11:21:23 AM EDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
>
> The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, including
> some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability of
> IO operations: nice thi
The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that, including
some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability of
IO operations: nice things we'd like to take advantage of.
Objections against baseling Hib
Started yesterday night actually...
I'm going to move forward as straightforward as possible and then probably
get together with Infinispan guys while myself looking at it from Ehcache's
perspective.
Basically, I _hope_ we can have the hibernate-jcache module be "open"
enough to provide "extension
My guts are that each cache will want to provide a specific
implementation but it would be nice to have a generic albeit less than
ideal 107 implementation.
Nobody has started this work AFAIK so you're very welcome :)
Emmanuel
On Wed 2014-03-19 17:13, Alex Snaps wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I wondere
On Tue 2014-03-18 18:26, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Guillaume Smet
> wrote:
> > I'll post as soon as I have a working prototype of what I would like
> > to achieve and then we can discuss from there.
>
> I finally succeeded in committing a few hours to proto
