Ok, so given the initial Super/Sub setup, what we get in
SimpleValueBinder#setType is this:
1) The XProperty passed in is defined as follows:
a) It is a JavaXProperty speciffically
b) Its 'annotatedElement' attribute (not exposed) is the
java.lang.reflect.Field for the Super#it field.
c) Interes
2013/8/29 Emmanuel Bernard
> On Thu 2013-08-29 14:22, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > Given an XProperty, is there a way to ask for annotations which are
> > defined only locally on that declared property (not on any super
> classes)?
>
> I believe that is what XProperty will give you.
> The list of XP
So actually what happens is that the XProperty is from the superclass.
This goes back to SimpleValueBinder, and the attempt to hook
AttributeConverter resolution into that code. Specifically in
org.hibernate.cfg.annotations.SimpleValueBinder#setType when we are
passed the XProperty. Maybe thi
On Thu 2013-08-29 14:22, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Given an XProperty, is there a way to ask for annotations which are
> defined only locally on that declared property (not on any super classes)?
I believe that is what XProperty will give you.
The list of XProperty of a given XClass is computed fro
Given an XProperty, is there a way to ask for annotations which are
defined only locally on that declared property (not on any super classes)?
Basically given this situation:
@MappedSuperclass
public class Super {
...
@Convert( converter=Converter1.class )
public String getIt() {
2013/8/29 Emmanuel Bernard
> Yes after 208 is in seems the best time.
Ok, cool.
> Don't worry too much about the
> other backend PRs,t hey are obsolete I suppose but I don't want to lose
> the work entirely.
>
Can we close some/most of these outdated PRs? The proposed changes still
can be ex
Mostly discussed LoadPlans.
[10:36] Minutes:
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2013/hibernate-dev.2013-08-29-15.04.html
[10:36] Minutes (text):
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2013/hibernate-dev.2013-08-29-15.04.txt
[10:36]
Yes after 208 is in seems the best time. Don't worry too much about the
other backend PRs,t hey are obsolete I suppose but I don't want to lose
the work entirely.
On Thu 2013-08-29 10:14, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to remove the prefix "hibernate-ogm" from the folder names of the
> O
Hi,
I'd like to remove the prefix "hibernate-ogm" from the folder names of the
OGM modules [1]. This will make navigating in a shell easier and also
aligns the structure of the code base with HSEARCH and HV. Note that this
is only about folder names, the artifact ids would stay unchanged.
If no-o
