Am 04.04.2013 03:09 schrieb "Steve Ebersole" :
>
> I started work on a Java 7 based css for out javadocs today. I have
attached the work I have done so far.
Have you forgotten the attachment?
> It is based on a cross between the javadoc-generated css, the css from
http://people.apache.org/~ebour
I started work on a Java 7 based css for out javadocs today. I have
attached the work I have done so far. It is based on a cross between
the javadoc-generated css, the css from
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/java7doc-fix.css and the css from
http://www.coderanch.com/t/542660/Java/java/Java-
Personally I use OpenJDK most of the time, but I definitely need Oracle's
one as well for testing.. that's indeed the same purpose here.
To clarify: we're testing against AS 7.2, not EAP, so no strings attached.
It just so happens it was uploaded to this other repository and not the
usual one; als
+1 for ci.hibernate.org. I also like that it not reflect Jenkins in its
name.
Same here.
2013/4/3 Hardy Ferentschik
>
> On 3 Apr 2013, at 20:34, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
> > Thinking about the domain name, would you prefer
> > - hibernate-ci
> > - ci.hibernate.org
>
> +1 for ci.hibernate.org.
On 3 Apr 2013, at 20:34, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Thinking about the domain name, would you prefer
> - hibernate-ci
> - ci.hibernate.org
+1 for ci.hibernate.org. I also like that it not reflect Jenkins in its name.
--hardy
___
hibernate-dev mailing
I shall for ever be indebted to you :-)
--hardy
On 3 Apr 2013, at 19:47, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
>
> On 3 avr. 2013, at 18:11, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>> Or why not just rename the packages to _private ;-) (only over my dead body
>> btw)
>
> That's why I did fight the fight. I fear
+1
On 04/03/2013 01:34 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Thinking about the domain name, would you prefer
> - hibernate-ci
> - ci.hibernate.org
> ?
>
> I feel in some way the name should convey it's not a standard java project
> as all other repositories starting by hibernate-, and clarify we didn'
Thinking about the domain name, would you prefer
- hibernate-ci
- ci.hibernate.org
?
I feel in some way the name should convey it's not a standard java project
as all other repositories starting by hibernate-, and clarify we didn't
make our own CI tool :-)
Sanne
On 3 April 2013 14:03, Emmanu
On 3 avr. 2013, at 18:11, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Or why not just rename the packages to _private ;-) (only over my dead body
> btw)
That's why I did fight the fight. I feared for your life ;)
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jbo
Details at http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/HibernateORM430Beta1Release
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Or probably more something like that:
in module.xml that is.
--Hardy
On 3 Jan 2013, at 6:12 PM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Something like this should work:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 6:03 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>> Do you ha
Something like this should work:
On 3 Jan 2013, at 6:03 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Do you have some details or an example how this is done?
>
> For HV, we consider everything under org.hibernate.validator.internal as
> private (and e.g. handle it like this in the OSGi manifest),
On 3 Jan 2013, at 5:58 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I did not know that JBoss AS modules let you define a glob of excluded
> (private) packages. Not sure if we use that in our HSearch (and other)
> modules, but we should :)
I don't think we do yet, but given the latest discussion on AS dev I t
Do you have some details or an example how this is done?
For HV, we consider everything under org.hibernate.validator.internal as
private (and e.g. handle it like this in the OSGi manifest), so it would
make sense to do the same for the AS module.
--Gunnar
2013/4/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> I did no
I did not know that JBoss AS modules let you define a glob of excluded
(private) packages. Not sure if we use that in our HSearch (and other)
modules, but we should :)
Emmanuel
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jb
On Wed 2013-04-03 16:06, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >>
> >>> If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make su
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> FWIW, we tried to upgrade to 4.2.x but we have other regressions which
> will need time to get diagnosed and fixed. So we won't be able to use
> 4.2.1 soon, even after its release.
In case you're interested, the regression we have with 4.2.x
Hi,
Sorry for bothering you with this, but we just got hit by
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-8092 in our applications
after an upgrade to 4.1.11 (we worked on fixes included in 4.1.10 and
needed the upgrade to get our bugs fixed).
Due to HHH-8092, with 4.1.10 and 4.1.11, our unique co
On 3 Jan 2013, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>>
>> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either run
>>>
>>> mvn clean install -s settings-example.
On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either run
> >
> >mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
> >
> > or add in your settings.xml the profile and a
On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either run
>
>mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
>
> or add in your settings.xml the profile and associated repository
> redhat-earlyaccess-repository
> and add it
The reason in.relation.to does not is because in.relation.to is uniquely
identifiable as a name (it's a domain name). This would not be the case for
'search' as
opposed to 'hibernate-search'.
On Wed 2013-04-03 13:33, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I'm not against a rename, but in terms of consistency I
I'm not against a rename, but in terms of consistency I noticed only the
java projects (jars we distribute) have such a prefix.
Websites and other infrastructure does not (in.relation.to awestruct)
You want to rename that too?
On 3 April 2013 13:16, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Thanks guys, nice t
Thanks guys, nice tough on the OAuth - GitHub integration.
I have a proposal: can we rename the Git repo hosting the configuration
to hibernate-continuous-integration or hibernate-ci?
I'm specifically asking because GitHub is not quite consistent in
whether or not it shows the organization it com
If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either run
mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
or add in your settings.xml the profile and associated repository
redhat-earlyaccess-repository
and add it to the list of active profiles. settings-example.xml will
show you
AFAIR, the test is a case Linda and the JPA EG wanted covered.
On Tue 2013-04-02 11:49, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the code is wrong. The test setup seems correct. The spec does not
> really rule this case out.
> I did not think about this case when writing the code below.
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
