Oh, didn't realize it was a topic branch. OK, no need to backport then. :)
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Ebersole"
> To: "Gail Badner"
> Cc: "Hibernate"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 9:56:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backport to metamodel branch?
>
> metamodel is a di
metamodel is a different type of branch. Its what is called a topic
branch. It has a limited lifetime. At some point we will merge the
work done on it forward to master. At that point in time, the
metamodel branch will go away.
On Tue 07 Feb 2012 09:13:11 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote:
> Now th
Now that we have a git branch for 5.0 work (metamodel), I'm assuming we need to
backport to the metamodel branch in addition to master (for 4.1).
Or will git auto-magically figure it all out when the metamodel branch is
merged into master (whenever that is)?
Gail
___
On 7 February 2012 11:14, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> it happens sometimes.
It's happening very often today.
>
> On 7 févr. 2012, at 08:57, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it seems like something is wrong with the database of the Hibernate forum.
>> Accessing https://forum.hibernate.org/ give
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> How is actually, physically serializing a EMF *instance* to another VM
> a valid use case? Notice that the case of writing the UUID/name to the
>
Good question, I was thinking of the following two cases with container
managed usage:
1. I
How is actually, physically serializing a EMF *instance* to another VM
a valid use case? Notice that the case of writing the UUID/name to the
serial stream is explicitly different that this. That approach is just
tokenizing the way to resolve the proper reference to the EMF on deser
using tha
it happens sometimes.
On 7 févr. 2012, at 08:57, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems like something is wrong with the database of the Hibernate forum.
> Accessing https://forum.hibernate.org/ gives me only a MySQL error:
>
> General ErrorSQL ERROR [ mysql4 ]
>
> Can't connect to local MyS
