On Mon 26 Sep 2011 11:09:56 AM CDT, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> For 2,
> The hard part is to understand when a given registry is used and for what
> purpose.
Not sure I understand what you mean here. Used in what way?
For lookups? Well the lookups are hierarchical. Thats not an issue at
all
>> Essentially you want to skip processing @BeforeClassOnce / @AfterClassOnce
>> if there are no test methods to execute for said class being processed.
>>
>
> Ideally, we should skip processing @BeforeClassOnce / @AfterClassOnce and
> @BeforeClass / @AfterClass but for now skipping these two Onc
For 2,
The hard part is to understand when a given registry is used and for what
purpose.
In a way Basic, Main, Core, Generic (the alternate names I can think of) are
not telling very much. The Basic registry holds services that are used at most
stages of Hibernate. Would Global make any sens
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Essentially you want to skip processing @BeforeClassOnce / @AfterClassOnce if
> there are no test methods to execute for said class being processed.
>
Ideally, we should skip processing @BeforeClassOnce / @AfterClassOnce and
@BeforeClass /
Essentially you want to skip processing @BeforeClassOnce /
@AfterClassOnce if there are no test methods to execute for said class
being processed.
I think you should be able to call
org.hibernate.testing.junit4.CustomRunner#computeTestMethods to
accomplish this. If computeTestMethods returns
Currently we utilize 3 different ServiceRegistry types within Hibernate
and I wanted to hopefully get some consensus on their names.
1) org.hibernate.service.internal.BootstrapServiceRegistryImpl. It
contains services that have to be known up front. Currently this is
limited to ClassLoaderSer
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-6677
I don't find a elegant way to fix this….
one option is in org.hibernate.testing.junit4.CustomRunner#withBeforeClasses,
we check if the test class has @Skip (and @RequiresDialect etc.), and if it
does, then return super.withBeforeClasses directly (i kn
Yeah I am aware. I have been working with Atlassian/Contegix to get
that working again.
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 12:32:41 PM CDT, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the connection between JIRA issues and the
> associated sources in FishEye/GitHub seems to be broken.
>
> Taking HHH-593