On Jul 14, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Or do you mean java.util.ServiceLoader ?
yes, i think Alex means this
>
> On Wed 13 Jul 2011 03:54:16 PM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> On 07/13/2011 09:46 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
>>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
>>>
>>> a w
Or do you mean java.util.ServiceLoader ?
On Wed 13 Jul 2011 03:54:16 PM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 09:46 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
>>
>> a warning
>>> - Second level cache isn't (yet?) using "ServiceInitiator approach",
>>> is this goi
On 07/13/2011 09:46 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
>
> a warning
>> - Second level cache isn't (yet?) using "ServiceInitiator approach",
>> is this going to change ?
>
> I don't pre-see it, Steve?
>> - Right now the mapping plan is "weak" in terms of typing
I guess maybe this is hassle based on which project key you are talking
about. For HHH- that is not an undue burden imo.
On Tue 12 Jul 2011 04:50:08 AM CDT, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> +1.
> Often we mix many issue numbers in a pull request - as far as I see
> we're all fine in picking one of them
On Jul 13, 2011, at 11:40 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Strong Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>> I've finished the port of all the Hibernate h2lc from the ehcache
>>> source base into the hibernate-ehcache modul
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Strong Liu wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>> I've finished the port of all the Hibernate h2lc from the ehcache
>> source base into the hibernate-ehcache module.
>> Now, polishing this, I also addressed this mapping from
On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Alex Snaps wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I've finished the port of all the Hibernate h2lc from the ehcache
> source base into the hibernate-ehcache module.
> Now, polishing this, I also addressed this mapping from old to new names.
> You can see the simple fix here:
> https: