anyone open a jira? i will take it
---
Strong Liu
http://hibernate.org
http://github.com/stliu
On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> +1 If there is a time we can change this, then now.
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:01:51 +0200, Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
>
>> What do
>> Again non resolution of the domain classes is already handled. Or should
>> be. That has been a consistent mantra as we have developed this new
>> metamodel code. As for types...
>
> Okey - is Components covered by this ?
Components are domain classes, so yes they would fall under what we
Nope. Those should be Class references.
On 06/16/2011 12:39 PM, Gail Badner wrote:
> What about Class fields in the "binding" model?
>
> For example, EntityBinding has:
>
> private Class entityPersisterClass;
>
> Should this field really be a class name?
>
> - Original Message -
> F
+1 If there is a time we can change this, then now.
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:01:51 +0200, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> What do y'all think of making "native" return the new "enhanced"
> generators now, in 4.0? Or do we leave "native" as is?
___
hibernate-
What about Class fields in the "binding" model?
For example, EntityBinding has:
private Class entityPersisterClass;
Should this field really be a class name?
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Ebersole"
To: "Max Rydahl Andersen"
Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday,
>>> In the new terminology, what we are discussing is the process for handling
>>> "metadata sources" (o.h.metamodel.source). What you describe is really a
>>> parallel source (o.h.metamodel.source.jdbc???). So it is going to be
>>> completely up to the developer of that code how the binding o
What do y'all think of making "native" return the new "enhanced"
generators now, in 4.0? Or do we leave "native" as is?
--
Steve Ebersole
http://hibernate.org
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailma
Cool ! I already implemented something on
https://github.com/gastaldi/hibernate-validator/tree/feature%2Fmod11
I would like your opinions on how to improve it
Thanks !
2011/6/16 Emmanuel Bernard :
> +1 for separate sub packages
>
> On 16 juin 2011, at 16:50, George Gastaldi wrote:
>
>> Hello !
>
+1 for separate sub packages
On 16 juin 2011, at 16:50, George Gastaldi wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I am working on HV-491 (Support the validation using MOD11 algorithm)
> that is used on validation of several personal identification
> documents (including Brazil).
>
> I was talking with Hardy about a
>> In the new terminology, what we are discussing is the process for handling
>> "metadata sources" (o.h.metamodel.source). What you describe is really a
>> parallel source (o.h.metamodel.source.jdbc???). So it is going to be
>> completely up to the developer of that code how the binding of so
Hello !
I am working on HV-491 (Support the validation using MOD11 algorithm)
that is used on validation of several personal identification
documents (including Brazil).
I was talking with Hardy about adding these country-specific
constraints on a separate package (like "br" for Brazil, "fr" for
FYI, I'm on pto for a few days (family medical issue).
I'd like to help you further with this but think it should just wait
until next week.
Scott
On 06/16/2011 07:54 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> first of all, I have finished this task, and test pass.
> but :), i have to make the follo
Hi there,
first of all, I have finished this task, and test pass.
but :), i have to make the following changes, i'd like to hear you guys'
thoughts before i go to much away.
1. adding envers into org.hibernate module in as7, so user's app can see both
hibernate and envers class
(with an separat
13 matches
Mail list logo
