Forgot to answer this question.
I like the idea of different channels, but not sure how complex it will
get.
How many channels did you have in mind?
Also, the more complex the higher the chances that you use the logging
framework in
unintended ways.
--Hardy
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:25:53 +020
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:06:47 +0200, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> we are using stax now under the covers as well.
>
> These are just different models of jaxp parsing: dom, sax, stax.
Right, and the benefit of JAXB is the typed API.
It is very hard to find reliable sources for performance comparisons
we are using stax now under the covers as well.
These are just different models of jaxp parsing: dom, sax, stax.
On 04/15/2011 10:57 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2011, at 17:49, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> What causes the bad performance? You do realize there are 3 aspects to
>
On Apr 15, 2011, at 17:49, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> What causes the bad performance? You do realize there are 3 aspects to
> performing jaxb right? You have the actual jaxp parsing, the validation and
> then finally the binding.
>
> Conversely, with DOM you have jaxp parsing, validation and D
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:45:23 +0200, Max Rydahl Andersen
wrote:
> im confused - are we seriously looking at using jaxb for parsing the xml
> configurations even though
> they are doing what they can to remove any jaxb stuff from AS7 codebase
> because of the bad performance
> and maintenance
What causes the bad performance? You do realize there are 3 aspects to
performing jaxb right? You have the actual jaxp parsing, the validation
and then finally the binding.
Conversely, with DOM you have jaxp parsing, validation and DOM model
binding.
So what is the big difference?
On 04/15/
im confused - are we seriously looking at using jaxb for parsing the xml
configurations even though
they are doing what they can to remove any jaxb stuff from AS7 codebase because
of the bad performance
and maintenance overhead (especially when its part of the server) ?
/max
On Apr 13, 2011, at
I dont have great concept-names for these yet, but i wanted to start a
discussion about a new set of thoughts running around in my head.
Essentially they relate to interacting with the JDBC Connection. The
current state of things is that we rely on the Dialect to know how to
perform those oper
