/Users/stliu/projects/hibernate/hibernate-core/hibernate-envers/src/main/java/org/hibernate/envers/entities/mapper/relation/lazy/ToOneDelegateSessionImplementor.java:36:
org.hibernate.envers.entities.mapper.relation.lazy.ToOneDelegateSessionImplementor
is not abstract and does not override abstr
Hi,
Do we still want to log configuration at INFO still? I was just looking
at http://pastebin.com/4GRZkDfY and wondering if this information should
still be at INFO or should we move it to DEBUG?
If we still want to log configuration at INFO, what if we were to change
the AS7 logging configu
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011, at 03:23 pm, Adam Warski wrote:
> I think it's quite reasonable to have both app-wide and session
> factory-wide services. Or you can call them "scopes", just like in a
> webapp you have request, session and app-scoped beans, here you can have
> app and session-scoped
Well I think I am leaning towards a "parameter object" no matter what we do
otherwise. So call this param object interface ConnectionOptions. It would
have a single method today (err, tomorrow when I write all this :) to get the
tenant id.
The tenant id is really associated with the session.
But 3 is how it's done today since we don't have the other solutions.
So yeah it's magical, but people do manage to make it work. I will
concede that it is not always perceived as straightforward, however.
Something to think about in the grander scheme of things is how someone
would deal with
I think for a user the best option (easiest to understand) would be 1).
3) is too magical. 2) is putting everything in one sack.
Adam
On Mar 22, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> reference http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5697
>
> For multi-tenancy impleme
I think it's quite reasonable to have both app-wide and session factory-wide
services.
Or you can call them "scopes", just like in a webapp you have request, session
and app-scoped beans, here you can have app and session-scoped services.
Or even maybe (Hibernate) session-scoped ones? Although I'
Done did do it...
On Monday, March 21, 2011, at 02:00 pm, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> tools should move to participant too.
>
> /max
>
> On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:06, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> >> 1) Tools
> >> 5) Shards
> >
> > Not sure about this ones
> >
> >> 2) Bean Validation
> >> 3) Bean V
