Re: [hibernate-dev] 3.5 branch

2010-05-31 Thread Steve Ebersole
Were you going to hop on irc? Today is holiday in the US so I am not really around today, but others may be there or some other time would be fine. #hibernate-dev on freenode is the best place to discuss this (you must be registered and identified with freenode to join). We can do it through ema

Re: [hibernate-dev] Database with UUID support

2010-05-31 Thread Steve Ebersole
To me the question is which is more prevalent. The binary form is for sure more efficient in terms of storage. I am not sure if it is any more efficient in terms of indexing (for joins resolution); I assume it is, but like I said, I am not certain. But a revelation I had was that with the new ty

Re: [hibernate-dev] next Hibernate Search release

2010-05-31 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
My original idea was to release 3.3 quickly. The Query DLS is almost done. What we really need is migrate to Lucene 3. That being said, you can back port it and if things go too long we will do a 3.2.1 release. On 31 mai 2010, at 14:16, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Hi all, > is there going to be a

[hibernate-dev] next Hibernate Search release

2010-05-31 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Hi all, is there going to be a 3.2.1 version of Hibernate Search, or are we going to skip that and focus on a quick release of 3.3 ? I fixed a nasty bug yesterday evening relating to using the MassIndexer on some complex object graphs, it's applied on trunk and was wondering if I should apply it t