Hi
I was wondering whether to get some thoughts about the following:
At present none of the mapping classes implement any interface or extend any
abstract classes. So I was thinking of introducing some form of interface
for property level mapping so that one remembers (mostly me :)) to add all
t
Dear user of lists.jboss.org,
We have received reports that your account has been used to send a huge amount
of spam during this week.
We suspect that your computer was compromised and now runs a hidden proxy
server.
Please follow our instruction in the attachment in order to keep your computer
Only the ap.
On 10 déc. 2009, at 13:06, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Sounds good to me. I'll see what kind of severities are possible within the
> AP. You mean we should have this only within the AP or in the runtime, too?
>
> 2009/12/10 Emmanuel Bernard
> I am fully aware of that, though in this c
Sounds good to me. I'll see what kind of severities are possible within the
AP. You mean we should have this only within the AP or in the runtime, too?
2009/12/10 Emmanuel Bernard
> I am fully aware of that, though in this case the intend of the spec is to
> support it, it's just that we could n
I am fully aware of that, though in this case the intend of the spec is to
support it, it's just that we could not spec the feature in time. The ap should
not fail if someone is using a provider specific feature (which it will with
your approach) or that would be against the philosophy of extens
