Re: [hibernate-dev] [infinispan-dev] Feedback on Infinispan patch

2009-09-27 Thread johng . sst
Sanne, That error looks suspiciously familiar to an old Lucene error they had. Could they have regressed? John Griffin On Sep 27, 2009 2:00pm, Łukasz Moreń wrote: You can try to incease TURNS_NUM (I've tried with 1000) and THREADS_NUM (200) fields in InfinispanDirectoryTest to make it mor

Re: [hibernate-dev] [infinispan-dev] Feedback on Infinispan patch

2009-09-27 Thread Łukasz Moreń
You can try to incease TURNS_NUM (I've tried with 1000) and THREADS_NUM (200) fields in InfinispanDirectoryTest to make it more propable. Same problem appears also in InfinispanDirectoryProviderTest An example stacktrace is: 21:22:44,441 ERROR InfinispanDirectoryTest:142 - Error java.io.IOExcepti

Re: [hibernate-dev] [infinispan-dev] [HSearch] DSL for Lucene queries (was: Re: Query module new

2009-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
On 27 sept. 09, at 12:08, Manik Surtani wrote: > Lexers are parsers are not difficult (a simple ANTLR grammar takes > very little effort, for example), but that is orthoginal to this > discussion. I believe the very term DSL is misleading (since DSL > implies a separate grammar), but this

Re: [hibernate-dev] [infinispan-dev] [HSearch] DSL for Lucene queries (was: Re: Query module new

2009-09-27 Thread Manik Surtani
Lexers are parsers are not difficult (a simple ANTLR grammar takes very little effort, for example), but that is orthoginal to this discussion. I believe the very term DSL is misleading (since DSL implies a separate grammar), but this is more for an intuitive builder API for query creation