Hibernate Validator 4.0.0.CR1 has been released. Please see
http://in.relation.to/12235.lace for details.
--Hardy
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
That's what I said as well. Separate maven module. However, one can feel a
disturbance in the force
when one mentions MAVEN MODULE within the Hibernate Team :)
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:18:23 +0200, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Ok. Just make sure we use a different maven module or something so that
On 27 Aug 2009, at 16:10, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
queryBuilder.withAnalyzer(Analyzer)
queryBuilder.withEntityAnalyzer(Class)
queryBuilder.basedOnEntityAnalyzer(Class)
.overridesForField(String field, Analyzer)
.overridesForField(String field, Analyzer
queryBuilder.withAnalyzer(Analyzer)
queryBuilder.withEntityAnalyzer(Class)
queryBuilder.basedOnEntityAnalyzer(Class)
.overridesForField(String field, Analyzer)
.overridesForField(String field, Analyzer)
.build() //sucky name
Perhaps
Hi Guys,
I'm making a soft delete using @SQLDelete and @Where with a flag called
"active"... when active = 1 the object is not deleted, else, the object was
removed and don't come back in the search queries... but i want to bring him
back even active = 0... so maybe i'll have to disable the @Where
On 27 Aug 2009, at 13:06, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
On 27 août 09, at 13:07, Manik Surtani wrote:
Very elegant. I'm generally a big fan of 'builder' patterns like
this, but this really isn't a DSL, is it? :) When you first
mentioned a DSL I had visions of defining a new grammar and an
On 27 août 09, at 13:07, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Very elegant. I'm generally a big fan of 'builder' patterns like
> this, but this really isn't a DSL, is it? :) When you first
> mentioned a DSL I had visions of defining a new grammar and an ANTLR
> parser, etc. But that is overkill.
Thi
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:48:42 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
> Did I make my case?
Yes. I can agree that your code is more readable and it will help building
queries.
That said, why not suggesting something like this to the Lucene folks
directly. I agree on
this one with Manik.
--Hardy
>
Very elegant. I'm generally a big fan of 'builder' patterns like
this, but this really isn't a DSL, is it? :) When you first
mentioned a DSL I had visions of defining a new grammar and an ANTLR
parser, etc. But that is overkill.
This approach certainly works, and will almost certainly p
On 26 août 09, at 22:08, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:39 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
I've been thinking about a DSL to build Lucene queries in the last
day.
What do you think of this proposal?
What do you really gain compared to native Lucene queries?
If your API achi
10 matches
Mail list logo
