On Thursday 20 September 2007 12:20:10 pm James Carman wrote:
> My point is that the directory structure doesn't match that of the
> trunk, so it will be very difficult to merge the changes from the
> HQL_ANTLR_2 branch back in (I'm no SVN expert, so I may be mistaken
> here). So, I guess I can co
Another problem with the code in the branch is that it uses Commons
Logging, whereas the code in the trunk uses SLF4J.
On 9/20/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is that the directory structure doesn't match that of the
> trunk, so it will be very difficult to merge the changes
My point is that the directory structure doesn't match that of the
trunk, so it will be very difficult to merge the changes from the
HQL_ANTLR_2 branch back in (I'm no SVN expert, so I may be mistaken
here). So, I guess I can copy your work from the HQL_ANTLR_2 branch
into my local copy of the tru
On Thursday 20 September 2007 11:25:00 am James Carman wrote:
> Well, how difficult would it be to get the HQL_ANTLR_2 branch
> mavenized so that it mimics the layout of the trunk? Wouldn't that
> branch, as it currently sits, be very difficult to merge back into the
> trunk? Could we make a copy
Well, how difficult would it be to get the HQL_ANTLR_2 branch
mavenized so that it mimics the layout of the trunk? Wouldn't that
branch, as it currently sits, be very difficult to merge back into the
trunk? Could we make a copy of the trunk to another branch so that we
can copy over your changes
On Thursday 20 September 2007 09:14:47 am James Carman wrote:
> What do you guys think about this...
>
> fromClause
>
> : FROM^ { weakKeywords(); } fromRange ( onJoin | pathJoin | COMMA! {
>
> weakKeywords(); } fromRange )*
> ;
>
> onJoin
>
> : ( ( ( LEFT | RIGHT ) (OUTER)? ) | FULL
What do you guys think about this...
fromClause
: FROM^ { weakKeywords(); } fromRange ( onJoin | pathJoin | COMMA! {
weakKeywords(); } fromRange )*
;
onJoin
: ( ( ( LEFT | RIGHT ) (OUTER)? ) | FULL | INNER )? JOIN^
identifier asAlias ON^ logicalExpression
;
pathJoin
