I request that timestamps be added to the output when using `--trace` option.
There is a hack to added timestamps to every STDOUT of make
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37623123/windows-batch-how-to-add-timestamp-while-redirecting-stdout-to-file
but that introduces overhead.
I think it woul
Is there a built-in function to extract all the prerequisites for target in a
makefile?
I could probably make a rule that will parse the makefile as a textfile from
the shell but since `make` already parses the targets and prereqs I'm hoping
there's a built-in way.
I hoped to spare you details but here goes:
I have another `make`-like tool that produces an XML as an artifact after
parsing my makefile which I'll then further process with Python.
It'd simplify things for me - a lot - if I could have `make` consider every
single prerequisite to be an actua
Yes, I am using it and yes the info it gives is very useful, parseable and
excellent in general.
The problem is that this information is only outputted by `make` AFTER the
makefile is finished executing whereas I need to access this information - via
some function that apparently doesn't exist
ed this on
Linux and it doesn't work
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38250056/gnu-make-terminal-rules-and-keyword-null/38252249#comment63925596_38252249
From: Tim Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 12:38 AM
To: Adrian Muresan
Cc: help-make@gnu.org
Subj
Is there anything I can do, short of modifying make, to force it to output the
full path for all files listed in the `--print-data-base` section?
Here's a fragment of what I see:
.obj/moc_guardedpropertychangetransition.o:
.moc/moc_guardedpropertychangetransition.cpp
# Implicit rule search h
to get the full path.
From: Philip Guenther
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 5:14 PM
To: Adrian Muresan
Cc: help-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: --print-data-base: how to force all filenames to have full path
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Adrian Muresan
wrote:
> Is there
What is the format of the `--print-data-base` entry? This is one example entry.
What do the lines below "Successfully updated mean"?
applinkmenumodel.o: applinkmenumodel.cpp
# Implicit rule search has been done.
# Implicit/static pattern stem: 'applinkmenumodel'
# Last modified 2016-07-11 10:
I have a makefile(s) that runs fine with --jobs=1 but when I run with --jobs=X
(X>1) it fails.
I know exactly why; it's because I have entries like this:
t1:
mkdir d1
create_makefile.bat > ./d1/makefile
t2:
cd d1
make -f makefile
Target t2 depends on t1 but that's not st
I'm building my `make` project using `--print-data-base` and then parsing the
output database for use in another step.
The database contains ALL targets defined in the makefile even if one or more
were not built.
Thankfully, in the database section of `make` output, whether a given target
was
10 matches
Mail list logo
