On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 11:30 -0700, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> Then, the generator must also emit a new rule like this
If you can change the makefile then I don't see why the very simple
solution provided in the GNU Make manual wouldn't just be used instead
of inventing something complex.
You can even d
On 2024-08-11 13:09, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 11:31 AM Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> Idea: fix the code generator so that for each rule that updates
>> an archive, it uses a unique name for the archive specific to that
>> rule. Perhaps by using numbers: libfoo.001.a, libfoo.002.a
