> After a quick squiz at your makefile I’m guessing line 42 should not read
>
>-o bin/M2-Planet
>
> But rather
>
>-o M2-Planet
>
> Or even better:
>
>-o $@
>
> No?
>
> Similar changes for line 67 are probably in order
No that does not correct the issue reported.
As bi
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 12:35 +, jerem...@pdp10.guru wrote:
> > After a quick squiz at your makefile I’m guessing line 42 should
> > not read
> > -o bin/M2-Planet
> > But rather
> > -o M2-Planet
> > Or even better:
> > -o $@
> > No?
> > Similar changes for line 67 are prob
Paul Smith writes:
> On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 12:35 +, jerem...@pdp10.guru wrote:
>> > After a quick squiz at your makefile I’m guessing line 42 should
>> > not read
>> > -o bin/M2-Planet
>> > But rather
>> > -o M2-Planet
>> > Or even better:
>> > -o $@
>> > No?
>> > Simi
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 19:50 +0100, Tomas Nordin wrote:
> > If you want to be able to run "make M2-Planet" you can create a
> > shortcut like this:
> >M2-Planet: bin/M2-Planet
>
> OK! Is that understood as a shortcut by make? So the "MUST ALWAYS
> build the target" does not apply in this case?
I think you should want to declare such a target as .PHONY, agreed Paul?
From: Help-make On Behalf Of Paul
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 13:29
To: Tomas Nordin ; help-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Parallel problem
ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments o
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 19:36 +, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
> I think you should want to declare such a target as .PHONY, agreed
> Paul?
Sure, that's probably a good idea.