Hi David
Thanks again for your help. However, I’m not quite there yet.
If I do:
verstr := $(shell ldd --version | head -1)
$(info glibc $(verstr) detected)
I see:
glibc ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.6) 2.19 detected
But if I do:
verstr := $(shell ldd --version | head -1 | awk '{print $NF}
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 09:46 +, David Aldrich wrote:
> But if I do:
>
> verstr := $(shell ldd --version | head -1 | awk '{print $NF}')
> $(info glibc $(verstr) detected)
>
> I see:
>
> glibc detected
>
> So there is something wrong with the awk command. It works ok from the
> command line b
> So, write:
>
> verstr := $(shell ldd --version | head -1 | awk '{print $$NF}')
Thanks Paul, that worked fine.
David
___
Help-make mailing list
Help-make@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
Le mardi 05 avril 2016 à 08:54 +, David Aldrich a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I am running gnu make 4.1 on Ubuntu. Make builds my C++ application
> that requires glibc 2.22 or higher. Ubuntu 14.04 has only glibc 2.19
> so my makefile checks the host o/s and, if it's Ubuntu, it links to
> my private cop
> How can "make" could build a C++ application that depends on glibc 2.22 when
> your system only have glibc 2.19 ?
glibc 2.19 has a bug that is critical for us. I don't want to upgrade the
version of the system's glibc because that could break other applications. I
have a copy of glibc 2.22 tha
Hello,
Make version 4.1 in Ubuntu 16.04 has different behaviour using the @
(silent) . From my makefile.
%o : %c
@echo "CC$<"
@$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(INCDIR) $< -o $@
used to produce this output in older versions of make.
CCmain.c
CCbob.c
CCsally.c
no
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:54 -0400, drwho wrote:
> Make version 4.1 in Ubuntu 16.04 has different behaviour using the @
> (silent) .
It's very helpful if you specify what the older version of make is that
you were using that had different behavior.
>
> %o : %c
> @echo "CC$<"
>
On 2016-04-06 02:35 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 13:54 -0400, drwho wrote:
Make version 4.1 in Ubuntu 16.04 has different behaviour using the @
(silent) .
It's very helpful if you specify what the older version of make is that
you were using that had different behavior.
%o : %c
David Aldrich wrote:
> glibc 2.19 has a bug that is critical for us. I don't want to
> upgrade the version of the system's glibc because that could break
> other applications. I have a copy of glibc 2.22 that we use just for
> linking our application.
Instead of doing either the usual thing in the
