Hi Luke,
On 01/02/16 21:29, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> Having to keep track of the bar's, baz's, qu+x's didn't help either :)
Sorry; I realised after posting that it might be a burden.
> Here is an "improved" makefile that I think demonstrates the situation
> more clearly.
[Snip an improved makefil
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 06:56:19 -0500,
Steven Simpson wrote:
> > Besides changing names, I also moved the "correct" branch up, to
> > remove the possibility that it was choosing the "mislead" branch
> > simply because it was listed first, which is what make does if
> > everything else ties.
>
> I und
