On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:07:08PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 14:32 -0500, Mike Haboustak wrote:
> > It seems that the value of $< is getting defaulted for implicit rules
> > during second expansion. However, the value of $< is correct in the
> > recipe.
> >
> > If this is the
On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 14:32 -0500, Mike Haboustak wrote:
> I've been trying to make use of secondary expansion and I ran into some
> confusion that I couldn't reconcile with manual. Specifically, The value
> of the automatic variable $< is not what I'd expect during the second
> expansion of an imp
I've been trying to make use of secondary expansion and I ran into some
confusion that I couldn't reconcile with manual. Specifically, The value
of the automatic variable $< is not what I'd expect during the second
expansion of an implicit rule prerequisite.
In the makefile below, foo.o is built v
