t;/")
(type "ext4"))
%base-file-systems))
(users (cons (user-account
(name "brettg")
(comment "Brett Gilio")
(group "users")
(supplementary
Hi all.
I have some questions about the availability and usability of specific
development environments in Emacs on GuixSD. I know that GuixSD is not
"production ready" but with 1.0 supposedly approaching soon, I am still
using Virtual Machines to Parabola GNU/Linux-libre for some of my
devel
(device (file-system-label "my-root"))
(mount-point "/")
(type "ext4"))
%base-file-systems))
(users (cons (user-account
(name "brettg")
(
(device (file-system-label "my-root"))
(mount-point "/")
(type "ext4"))
%base-file-systems))
(users (cons (user-account
(name "brettg")
(
Hi all. I maintain my own emacs configuration designed to be integrated
into guix. One of the parts of maintaining a configuration is package
management, which I of course rely on Guix to do (rather than pulling
from MELPA directly). There are many packages that need to be installed
before my c
Hi all,
I'm not really sure how to approach this error I am getting. I started
getting this today on a recent pull. I'm not sure if it is a bug or
what, nor where to look. I looked in the nix package and in some
services I thought would be related but nothing.
: warning: 'nix-server-socket'
brettg@guixsd ~$ guix pull
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at
'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
Building from this channel:
guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 86228e5
: warning: 'nix-server-socket' is deprecated,
Hi all.
I am trying to use GSL in my C project on GuixSD.
brettg@guixsd ~/cproj$ guix package --search-paths
export PATH="/home/brettg/.guix-profile/bin"
export GIT_EXEC_PATH="/home/brettg/.guix-profile/libexec/git-core"
export XDG_DATA_DIRS="/home/brettg/.g
Hey all.
I am trying to use the rust language server. This might be a better
question for a rust oriented mailing list, but I am going to give it a
go here first.
I imported and installed the RLS from the crate importer, and installed
it that way. When I try to start the RLS from emacs using
Hey all.
I am trying to compile the newest Chez Scheme locally from a git
checkout. There are a number of shebang patches that have to be done for
it to compile "traditionally" (not using the guix build --with-source)
so I can generate a .compile_commands for my lsp to know how to
reference h
On 04.04.2019 21:38, Alex Kost wrote:
Brett Gilio (2019-04-01 16:13 -0500) wrote:
Hi all. I am hoping the maintainer of emacs-guix will see this:
Hello,
Whenever I try to search for a package, or perform any of the routine
guix commands using the emacs-guix interface, I am getting this e
Hey all, is anybody out there using Proof General with Pierre's
company-coq? I am having an issue getting the prettified symbols to
register, and none of the math related fonts (tex-bundled mostly?) seem
to be encoding into Emacs properly.
I'd appreciate some help if anybody has some.
Brett G
Hey all,
I reference the newt module in this file of my channel
https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/guix-system/tree/master/guile-modules/gscale/screen.scm
However, when I `guix pull` it fails to build citing that there is no
code available for that module. I have guile-newt installed system wide,
a
ad some time to look at this. Here is what echoing $GUILE_LOAD_PATH
returns for me
brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system/dotfiles [env]$ echo $GUILE_LOAD_PATH
/home/brettg/Repos/guix-system:/home/brettg/Repos/guix-system:/home/brettg/Repos/guix-system:/home/brettg/.guix-profile/share/guile/site/2
Yes, sorry. I renamed the file so I could update guix without the build
failing. Here is the file:
https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/guix-system/tree/master/guile-modules/gscale/screen.scmbak
On 23.04.2019 07:35, Gábor Boskovits wrote:
Hello,
ezt írta (időpont: 2019. ápr. 20., Szo, 21:53):
Hey
Hey Gabor,
I changed that to see if it would find newt bindings, but it failed that
way too saying there is no code for module "newt bindings". As I said to
Ludo, this is regardless of if I install guile-newt to a local profile
or system-wide. For whatever reason, it doesn't seem to find it. I
To additionally qualify the issue. I can manually load newt from the
guile interpreter just fine. It is only when my channel is getting built
from guix.
On 23.04.2019 18:49, bre...@posteo.net wrote:
Hey Gabor,
I changed that to see if it would find newt bindings, but it failed
that way too sa
Hey all, I am looking to try and modify where `guix pull` looks for the
channels.scm file. I know about the -C flag, but is there a way to make
this permanent so I do not have to append it manually? I would think
maybe it would be part of the substitute urls like modifying the guix
daemon servi
On 18.11.2019 00:10, Chris Marusich wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
I typically start Emacs in server mode using a shepherd user service,
so rarely restart Emacs.
If it isn't too much to ask, could you share the configuration you use
to accomplish this? I'd like to do something
Hey all,
I am experimenting with the inferior system a little bit. I am
attempting to see if I can specify a specific version of the linux-libre
kernel to be taken from an inferior and applied to my system
configuration.
(define kernel-channel-inf
;; This is the old revision from which
;
On 19.11.2019 22:26, Marius Bakke wrote:
Konrad Hinsen writes:
Hi Simon,
Maybe a "gfortran-toolchain" package with all the battery included?
That sounds like a very good idea! And I even volunteer to
implement it. Except if someone comes up with a better
solution of course.
Sounds gre
On 19.11.2019 22:57, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hello!
bre...@posteo.net writes:
On 18.11.2019 00:10, Chris Marusich wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
I typically start Emacs in server mode using a shepherd user
service,
so rarely restart Emacs.
If it isn't too much to ask, could
On 19.11.2019 22:58, bre...@posteo.net wrote:
On 19.11.2019 22:57, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hello!
bre...@posteo.net writes:
On 18.11.2019 00:10, Chris Marusich wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
I typically start Emacs in server mode using a shepherd user
service,
so rarely rest
On 19.11.2019 21:02, bre...@posteo.net wrote:
Hey all,
I am experimenting with the inferior system a little bit. I am
attempting to see if I can specify a specific version of the
linux-libre kernel to be taken from an inferior and applied to my
system configuration.
(define kernel-channel-in
01:36: In procedure lookup-compiler:
In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1
(expecting struct): (#)
Will keep investigating a way to do this.
Brett Gilio
brettg@oryx ~/Repos/cfg/machines/oryx$ guix system build config.scm
Updating channel 'guix' from Git reposi
nging:
Instead, it is telling me:
guix/gexp.scm:201:36: In procedure lookup-compiler:
In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1
(expecting struct): (#)
Will keep investigating a way to do this.
Brett Gilio
brettg@oryx ~/Repos/cfg/machines/oryx$ guix system
was available in the store, so now it is not
hanging:
Instead, it is telling me:
guix/gexp.scm:201:36: In procedure lookup-compiler:
In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1
(expecting struct): (#)
Will keep investigating a way to do this.
Brett Gilio
brettg@oryx ~/Repos/
On 20.11.2019 05:37, John Soo wrote:
Hi Brett,
A touch off-topic.
That is what I do, like in my mlton package.
Do you have urweb packaged by any chance, too?
It would really save me the trouble!
- John
John,
I am familiar with it but I do not have it packaged. If you would like I
mi
On 20.11.2019 11:57, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
This is very nice.
As far as I know, the inferior interface is still "unstable", but this
would be a good start for a blog/cookbook article nonetheless! :)
Pierre,
I think something like this definitely should go in the cookbook
regarding inferi
On 29.12.2019 12:54, Jone wrote:
Previously it was an adequate alternative of non-systemd distributions.
But
now.. I'm shocked!
Minimal config -> XFCE -> wait what.. GDM? WTF? I'm not say anything
about
NM as default..
I have long wanted to say this: return the normal default settings!!
On 29.12.2019 13:32, Jone wrote:
I am already a former user of this distribution. Excuse me but about
half a year ago I tried installing this with the current configuration
on another machine. Hah! Slim? No, GDM! XFCE -> Slim - it should be
so!
I’m just sad that such a distribution has fallen
On 29.12.2019 13:49, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
Jone,
Thanks for your feedback, although like Brett I'm just confused.
Guix has never been an anti-systemd distribution. If it's been sold
to you as such I wish it hadn't.
Neither of the programmes you mention have anything to do with
syste
32 matches
Mail list logo
