Hi Guix,
I am trying to migrate from Debian to Guix. I am used to using
RVM/rbenv to manage my ruby versions, but I don't think they're
packaged for guix. They also obviously go against the grain of having
guix manage all your software.
Long story short, my project requires Ruby 3.3.0, and the la
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Jun 14 2024, Daniel Littlewood wrote:
> I am trying to migrate from Debian to Guix.
Congratulations & welcome! I did the same thing two and half years ago.
The next two months were some of the most painful weeks in my life, but
now I'm in a very happy place.
> I am used to
Hi Guix!
I'm having trouble where my virtual private server (VPS) [1] has
incorrect routing information configured. From a recovery console:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
root@droplet-base ~# ip route
default dev eth1
10.108.0.0/20 dev eth1 proto kernel scope l
Hello Dan,
I know very little about Ruby either, except that updates seem to go
relatively smoothly compared to other modern languages. Adding a new
version is quite trivial, here is one:
(define-public ruby-3.3
(package
(inherit ruby-3.2)
(version "3.3.3")
(source
(origin
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Jun 14 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> the default gateway isn't pointing towards the internet-routable
> gateway
The traditional answer has been that our dhclient service doesn't work
very well. I had similar issues two years ago and, lacking time, simply
went with network-mana
Hi Felix!
Felix Lechner writes:
> I believe the 'dhcp-configuration' is not quite sophisticated enough so
> you may have to use the config-file option and include this content:
>
> # Assign this interface an IP address only.
> # (This disables setting the gateway router, DNS, domain, etc
I managed to find an alternative that seems to work without disabling
eth0 entirely or bloating my barebones server with NetworkManager.
Connman. The configuration and the routing tables are much more
complicated unfortunately, but it works.
(Curiously I see a new IP in the routing table that neve
Hi,
Why does the package definition below provide a grafted version 1.08.1
instead of the source I requested, please?
Kind regards
Felix
* * *
(define-public nyacc/juix
(let* ((commit "41691b062b598a92549821879766e0ee48b635da")
(revision "0"))
(package
(inherit nyacc)
Hello Felix,
On 2024-06-14 16:27:35 -0700, Felix Lechner via wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why does the package definition below provide a grafted version 1.08.1
> instead of the source I requested, please?
>
> Kind regards
> Felix
>
> * * *
>
> (define-public nyacc/juix
> (let* ((commit "41691b062b598a92549
Hi Tomas,
Thank you for writing!
On Sat, Jun 15 2024, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Could you write bit more about how to reproduce it and what to look
> for?
My issue may be with 'guix shell'. Would you please run
guix shell nyacc
one time in order to get version 1.08.1 into your store and into yo
> Andreas Enge hat am 14.06.2024 19:36 CEST geschrieben:
>
> An interesting question would be whether all the packages that still depend
> on ruby@3.1 can use ruby@3.2 or ruby@3.3 instead.
There are breaking changes between these Ruby versions.
For most packages, upgrading Ruby and having the te
11 matches
Mail list logo