Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 08:00, Garjola Dindi wrote:
> I recently installed the Guix package manager on Debian and found
> symlinks on /usr/local/share/info/. One of them looks like this
>
> ls -l /usr/local/share/info/dir
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 60 Jan 10 12:04 /usr/local/share/info/dir ->
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:59:58AM +0100, Pierre-Antoine Bouttier wrote:
> I try to install libnode through guix and I have this error :
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> In procedure readlink: No such file or directory
Hi,
Is your guix up-to-date? I encountered the s
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 03:44:41PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> You might spend a loong time building things but it depends on the
> specific package(s).
I would argue that while using time-machine one does not expect
substitutes to be available, any way, since the old binaries are removed
by
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> Is your guix up-to-date? I encountered the same issue, but from what I
> remember it disappeared after upgrading guix.
>
> WŻ
thank you very much for your answer.
I had this error just after running guix pull. So I think my guix is up-to-date.
Regards
---
Pierre-Antoine Bouttie
On Thu 14-Jan-2021 at 09:07:47 +01, zimoun
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 08:00, Garjola Dindi wrote:
>
>> I recently installed the Guix package manager on Debian and found
>> symlinks on /usr/local/share/info/. One of them looks like this
>>
>> ls -l /usr/local/share/info/dir
>> lrwxrw
Hello,
> This is really well written. May I edit this article and reproduce it
> for the guix blog and perhaps the guix manual? If ludo's ok with me
> putting it on the blog, then I intend to end the blog post with "This
> article first appeared in this personal blog (link here) and is
> repro
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 09:30, Wiktor Żelazny wrote:
> I will retry now my attempts to fix the r-foreign problem with
> --no-substitutes added.
I guess it will not change your problem at hand: the missing tarball.
If I understand correctly, your initial message describes 2 issues:
- hash
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 21:27, Pierre-Antoine Bouttier
wrote:
> \ 'patch-node-shebang' phasebuilder for
> `/gnu/store/a22nqd33fk2dp0zrm7jsqp50ncibw2ip-libnode-10.20.0.drv' failed with
> exit code 1
Thanks for the report. The regression is introduced by 1d77141f6d.
The patch #45862 fixes i
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via writes:
> Pierre,
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道：
>> I'll add the above to my next reconfiguration (tonight or tomorrow)
>> and will let you know what happens here.
>
> I hoped to gleefully report failure (especially after Maxime's
> message), but my X230T susp
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer 写道：
>> Shouldn't that be the default behavior though?
>
> That's subjective. I don't think we should ever editorialise if
> that's what you mean: Guix service configuration wrappers should
> strictly wrap, not tweak defaults
Mathieu Othacehe writes:
> Hello,
>
>> This is really well written. May I edit this article and reproduce it
>> for the guix blog and perhaps the guix manual? If ludo's ok with me
>> putting it on the blog, then I intend to end the blog post with "This
>> article first appeared in this personal
Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer 写道：
Shouldn't that be the default behavior though?
That's subjective. I don't think we should ever editorialise if
that's what you mean: Guix service configuration wrappers should
strictly wrap, not tweak defaults on a (majority) whim.
However, here our wrapping is
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:48:35AM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> I guess it will not change your problem at hand: the missing tarball.
A tarball is there, just a different one. I would like to make guix
accept it.
> About the hash mismatch, game over with time-machine.
Are you sure? I remember a situa
Newb, obviously.
Installed on foreign system (Pengwin on WSL-2).
Tried the installation of "hello" as a sanity check. It fails with:
guix install: error: cannot kill processes for uid `999' : failed with
exit code 1
--
I've been stuck here about a week. The usual diagnosis seems to be that
g
I am having real problems with Unison, I installed via Guix and it is
not working so I want to remove it and try with an apt install.
I have run
guix package -r unison
and it seems to work, I have also installed unison with
sudo apt install unison
and that seemed to work as well but
Le 14 janvier 2021 08:34:33 GMT-05:00, Mick Sulley a écrit :
>I am having real problems with Unison, I installed via Guix and it is
>not working so I want to remove it and try with an apt install.
>
>I have run
>
> guix package -r unison
>
>and it seems to work, I have also installed uniso
Mick,
Mick Sulley 写道：
1) How can I get it to look for the standard version rather than
the
guix version
There isn't a more or less standard version, just bash caching the
last used binary. Use ‘hash -r’ to clear bash's cache and make it
look again.
My PATH is
(So $PATH isn't used at a
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 20:00, Wiktor Żelazny wrote:
>> About the hash mismatch, game over with time-machine.
>
> Are you sure? I remember a situation where a package was defined in my
> private channel. Then, someone committed a definition for the same
> package to guix, but the definition i
Hi,
To remove Guix completely:
> ~/.config/guix
> ~/.cache/guix
> ~/.guix-profile
> /gnu
> /var/guix
> /var/log/guix
/etc/init/guix-daemon.conf
/etc/systemd/system/guix-daemon.service
/etc/systemd/system-store.mount
/etc/init.d/guix-daemon
/usr/local/bin/guix
/usr/local/share/info/gu
19 matches
Mail list logo
