Hi Reza,
last time I tried installing Guix System with iPXE it also wouldn’t
work. AFAICS this is an unimplemented feature.
IIRC it hung trying to find the root file system because of the peculiar
way Guix System boots.
I’d be very happy to see this implemented.
--
Ricardo
Thanks for your response. You mean that the only way to use GuixSD
on a cloud server is to install it manually on some other existing Linux
Distribution?
Best,
Reza
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Hi Reza,
>
> last time I tried installing Guix System with iPXE
Fwiw, I'm currently installing Guix manually from the boot ISO with
hetzner's VPSs.
You just have to ask them to make the ISO available as one of the boot
ISOs.
Don't know if that is more convenient than installing from another
distro though?
Alex
Reza Alizadeh Majd writes:
> Thanks for your
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> I've run aground with Haskell's ghc (interpreter works fine) - running
>> ghc on a basic hello world program fails. I identified couple issues:
>>
>> - Include directory for linux headers wasn't passed to gcc
>>(`C_INCLUDE_PATH=/gnu/... ghc` fixed it)
>> - Lib C's
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:46:35AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> > Also, is it expected that packages from guix commits dating
> > from a few years ago will still work in this setting? Thanks!
>
> Commits before the introduction of inferiors likely won’t work,
> unfortunately.
Add
Hi,
I am trying to install a non-packaged piece of software, [[
https://nomacs.org/][nomacs]]. It
seems that through the paradigm of Guix, this is to be done with ~guix
package~ rather than with ~make~ etc. Or, put differently, to install
an application which is not in the package repos, I need
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:08:01AM +, Lorem Ipsum wrote:
> $ sha256sum 3.12.tar.gz
> f4a32169e6c0cb939971da2732e4d67c6e2e649506da1b55bfc94963a26280ff
>
> This is where I'm stuck. I know that the hash needs to be base32 and
> that the hash returned by ~sha256sum~ is not that. I would think th
Le 2 juillet 2019 13:08:01 GMT+02:00, Lorem Ipsum a
écrit :
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to install a non-packaged piece of software, [[
>https://nomacs.org/][nomacs]]. It
>seems that through the paradigm of Guix, this is to be done with ~guix
>package~ rather than with ~make~ etc. Or, put differently,
-- Forwarded message -
From: Lorem Ipsum
Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Checksum error on manual package install
To: Leo Famulari
That works and I see where I missed it in the docs. Thank you!
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:47 PM Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 0
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:31:22PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Nice work! You should use guix download to get the right hash, like so: "guix
> download 3.12.tar.gz". You can also put the hash of another package, see it
> fail and it will give you the hash it got instead.
Additionally you can
Hello, Guix Help! I am translating Guix manual and found that the author is
entirely given to reproducibility. It leads to such phrases that metadata
breaks reproducibility when he describes '--save-provenance' flag of 'guix
pack' command here:
'This option is not enabled by default because, li
Le 3 juillet 2019 06:05:02 GMT+02:00, zna...@disroot.org a écrit :
>Hello, Guix Help! I am translating Guix manual and found that the
>author is entirely given to reproducibility. It leads to such phrases
>that metadata breaks reproducibility when he describes
>'--save-provenance' flag of 'guix pac
zna...@disroot.org writes:
> Hello, Guix Help! I am translating Guix manual and found that the
> author is entirely given to reproducibility. It leads to such phrases
> that metadata breaks reproducibility when he describes
> '--save-provenance' flag of 'guix pack' command here:
>
> 'This option i
13 matches
Mail list logo
