Alex Kost writes:
> myglc2 (2016-07-16 18:07 +0300) wrote:
>
[...]
> I'm very sorry for not responding to the rest (you write a lot! :-)).
NP. I appreciate what you did write ;-)
> The bottom line: I don't like when a REPL is started automatically after
> a file open, and I think (it's just my
myglc2 (2016-07-16 18:07 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> myglc2 (2016-07-14 03:12 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Kost writes:
>>>
myglc2 (2016-07-12 17:22 +0300) wrote:
>> [...]
> Would it make sense to add this info to the doc?
Sorry, what info do you mean?
>>>
>>> I mean a
myglc2 (2016-07-18 16:05 +0300) wrote:
> myglc2 writes:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
> [...]
>>> It's up to a user to decide how (s)he wants to edit his/her files (in
>>> this case: with or without a help of Geiser).
>>
>> Agreed. But I would prefer for Guix by default to start the REPL and
>> provide
myglc2 writes:
> Alex Kost writes:
[...]
>> It's up to a user to decide how (s)he wants to edit his/her files (in
>> this case: with or without a help of Geiser).
>
> Agreed. But I would prefer for Guix by default to start the REPL and
> provide a way for me to disable this behavior if I like ;-
Alex Kost writes:
> myglc2 (2016-07-14 03:12 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
>>
>>> myglc2 (2016-07-12 17:22 +0300) wrote:
> [...]
Would it make sense to add this info to the doc?
>>>
>>> Sorry, what info do you mean?
>>
>> I mean add an explanation along the lines of what your wrote a
myglc2 (2016-07-14 03:12 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> myglc2 (2016-07-12 17:22 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>>> Would it make sense to add this info to the doc?
>>
>> Sorry, what info do you mean?
>
> I mean add an explanation along the lines of what your wrote above to
> the documentation. May
Alex Kost writes:
> myglc2 (2016-07-12 17:22 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
>>
>>> myglc2 (2016-07-11 18:09 +0300) wrote:
>>>
Running guix/debian ...
When I do 'M-x guix-edit RET screen RET' I get ...
"Autodoc not available (No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x
myglc2 (2016-07-12 17:22 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> myglc2 (2016-07-11 18:09 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Running guix/debian ...
>>>
>>> When I do 'M-x guix-edit RET screen RET' I get ...
>>>
>>> "Autodoc not available (No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x
>>> run-geiser))"
>>
>> Ouch, I
Alex Kost writes:
> myglc2 (2016-07-11 18:09 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Running guix/debian ...
>>
>> When I do 'M-x guix-edit RET screen RET' I get ...
>>
>> "Autodoc not available (No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x run-geiser))"
>
> Ouch, I've just answered you on #guix (using sneek).
Thanks, so
myglc2 (2016-07-11 18:09 +0300) wrote:
> Running guix/debian ...
>
> When I do 'M-x guix-edit RET screen RET' I get ...
>
> "Autodoc not available (No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x run-geiser))"
Ouch, I've just answered you on #guix (using sneek).
This error is harmless. It comes from Ge
Running guix/debian ...
When I do 'M-x guix-edit RET screen RET' I get ...
"Autodoc not available (No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x run-geiser))"
... This puzzles me because guix already has 2 REPLs running ...
* * Guile REPL * 1228 REPL (Guile REPL<1> run)
* *G
11 matches
Mail list logo
