Hellon
De Andreas Enge le 28/08/2023 à 20:05:
> if I understand things correctly, we would like the following behaviour
> for propagated inputs in the texlive context:
> We have these metapackages with propagated inputs; all of these inputs
> have "out" and "doc". Then we would like to automatical
Hi,
De Nicolas Goaziou le 28/08/2023 à 20:01:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> >>> In any case, I suggest to write a proper bug report for this. Hopefully,
> >>> someone with better understanding about the implications of GUIX_TEXMF
> >>> will be able to solve this.
> >>
> >> I can do that for the te
Hello,
Am Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 06:54:35PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> > I don't understand how "out" and "doc" are different in this respect. The
> > "out" output of a collection meta-package has no content of its own and it
> > only serves to gather the "out" outp
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Emmanuel Beffara writes:
>>> In any case, I suggest to write a proper bug report for this. Hopefully,
>>> someone with better understanding about the implications of GUIX_TEXMF
>>> will be able to solve this.
>>
>> I can do that for the texdoc behaviour.
By the way, I
Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> I don't understand how "out" and "doc" are different in this respect. The
> "out" output of a collection meta-package has no content of its own and it
> only serves to gather the "out" outputs of its inputs. Similarly, the "doc"
> output would have no content of its own
Hello,
Thanks for the instructive feedback!
De Nicolas Goaziou le 28/08/2023 à 13:01:
> Every texlive-* package comes with its documentation, in a separate
> output. "doc" output are not uncommon at all in Guix. Therefore,
> I disagree with the inconsistency you're talking about.
Ok, I admit I d
Hello,
Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> Yet, as far as I know, most packages in Guix (apart from texlive-* ones) come
> with their documentation, so it feels somewhat inconsistent.
Every texlive-* package comes with its documentation, in a separate
output. "doc" output are not uncommon at all in Guix
Hello,
De Nicolas Goaziou le 27/08/2023 à 12:13:
> > Apparently, all individual packages have a specific "doc" output but
> > collections and schemes do not and they don't have them as inputs either. So
> > we end up with an installation with no documentation
>
> It sounds like a good default to
Hello,
Thanks for that detailed report!
Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> There has been a lot of movement around TeX Live recently and it is very nice
> to see. We now have a usable modular installation and a great number of
> available packages and collections. However, I don't understand what is th
Hello Guix,
There has been a lot of movement around TeX Live recently and it is very nice
to see. We now have a usable modular installation and a great number of
available packages and collections. However, I don't understand what is the
proper way to reach documentation in the current system.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo
