Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>>
I still think that we should hide the plain gcc packages on the command
line.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>
>> Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)? I
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> I still think that we should hide the plain gcc packages on the command
>>> line.
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)? I searched for
> GCC on the command line with
Hi Simon,
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:24, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)? I searched for
>> GCC on the command line with “guix package --search=gcc” and the results
>> did not include the plain gcc packages.
>
> The `hidden-package` function, i
Hi Ricardo,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:24, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)? I searched for
> GCC on the command line with “guix package --search=gcc” and the results
> did not include the plain gcc packages.
The `hidden-package` function, is it docu
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> I still think that we should hide the plain gcc packages on the command
>> line.
>
> Agreed.
Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)? I searched for
GCC on the command line with “guix package --search=gcc” and the results
di
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I still think that we should hide the plain gcc packages on the command
> line.
Agreed.
Ludo’.
> I still think that we should hide the plain gcc packages on the command
> line.
I agree.
I also fell in the trap. :-)
Installed gcc+binutils+etc. instead of gcc-toolchain and then weird
linking issue.
Thank you for your confirmation.
All the best,
simon
zimoun writes:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 16:21, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> I’m assuming that you installed the “gcc” package. Don’t do that.
>> Install “gcc-toolchain” instead.
>
> Is it because of the comment in the definition of `make-gcc-toolchain'?
>
> ;; The main raison d'
Hi Ricardo,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 16:21, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> I’m assuming that you installed the “gcc” package. Don’t do that.
> Install “gcc-toolchain” instead.
Is it because of the comment in the definition of `make-gcc-toolchain'?
;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1
<>>>
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize
>>>
>>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize>>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> and get this
>
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize
>>
>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize>>>
>> >
>>
>> and get this:
>>
>> $ gcc c.c
>> collect2: fat
ackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize
> <
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize
> >
> >
> > and get this:
> >
> > $ gcc c.c
> > collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld'
zna...@tutanota.com writes:
> Hi! I compile this
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize
>
> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize>
>
> and get this:
>
> $ gcc c.c
> c
Hi! I compile this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6161823/dd-how-to-calculate-optimal-blocksize>
and get this:
$ gcc c.c
collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld'
compilation terminated.
14 matches
Mail list logo