Ludovic Courtès writes:
> The best way to know that is by sending a patch. ;-)
>
> A common criterion in deciding whether or not to enable an optional
> feature is how widely used it is vs. how much it adds to the size of the
> package closure. If you can provide that kind of info in your patc
Hello,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Catonano writes:
>
>> which package are you talking about ?
>>
>> Anyway, you can submit a patch ☺
>
> The chromaprint package.
>
> I'll submit a patch but I wanted to ask, maybe the original author of
> the recipe has an opinion about it.
The best way to kno
Catonano writes:
> which package are you talking about ?
>
> Anyway, you can submit a patch ☺
The chromaprint package.
I'll submit a patch but I wanted to ask, maybe the original author of
the recipe has an opinion about it.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2018-04-03 8:24 GMT+02:00 Pierre Neidhardt :
>
> The chromaprint commandline tool "fpcalc" to compute fingerprints is
> missing.
>
> I believe passing the CMAKE argument
>
> -DBUILD_TOOLS=ON
>
> would be enough.
>
> I guess it would be a nice fit for a separate output.
>
> --
> Pierre Neid
The chromaprint commandline tool "fpcalc" to compute fingerprints is
missing.
I believe passing the CMAKE argument
-DBUILD_TOOLS=ON
would be enough.
I guess it would be a nice fit for a separate output.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
